Critical ınquiry based learning: A model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic

Authors

  • Saiful Prayogı
  • Leny Yuanıta
  • WASIS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

CIBL model, critical thinking ability

Abstract

Teaching critical thinking (CT) to prospective teachers has been a concern for a long time, and prospective teacher training becomes an appropriate period for interventions that promote CT ability. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a model of learning that accommodates aspects of prior knowledge, motivation, and CT. This study aims to develop Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning (CIBL) model to promote the CT ability of prospective teachers of physic (PTP). This study is based on Nieveen’s theory about the criteria of rich product quality (valid, practice, and effective) and the theory of Borg and Gall about development research. The CIBL model embraced three criteria, namely validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The CIBL model was validated by experts through the mechanism of the focus group discussion (FGD) (for validity aspect), the implementation of the model in the class were observed by a number of observers (for practicality aspect), and the assessment of CT ability is done after the learning process (for effectiveness aspects) and then analyzed. The findings of the research showed that the CIBL model is feasible because of its validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This means that the CIBL model was able to promote CT ability of PTP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberta Education. (2010). Inspiring Education: A Dialogue with Albertans. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Education.

Albrecht, W. S., & Sack, R. J. (2000). Accounting education: Charting The Course Through A Perilous Future. Accounting Education Series, Vol. 16. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.

Alexander, P. A. (1996). The Past, the Present and Future of Knowledge Research: A Reexamination of the Role of Knowledge in Learning and Instruction. Educational Psychologist. 31: 89–92.

Ambrose, S., & Lovett, M. (2014). Prior Knowledge is More Than Content: Skills and Beliefs Also Impact Learning. Applying Science of Learning in Education, 1(2), 7-19.

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works: 7 Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching (1st Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Arends, R. (2012). Learning to Teach. Ninth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ashton, P. (1988). Teaching Higher-order Thinking and Content: An Essential Ingredient in Teacher Preparation. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

Bahtiar, & Prayogi, S. (2012). Evaluasi Hasil Pembelajaran Sains (IPA). Mataram: CV. Dimensi Raya.

Bailin, S. (2002). Critical Thinking and Science Education. Science and Education, 11, 361–375.

Barrow, L. (2006). A Brief History of Inquiry-From Dewey to Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265-278.

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating PBL: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(4), 369-398.

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2004). Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction. Fourth Edition. Longman Inc.

Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197-253.

Cassady, J. C., Kozlowski, A. & Kornmann, M. (2008). Electronic Field Trips as Interactive Learning Events: Promoting Student Learning at a Distance. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3), 439-454.

Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children’s Responses to Anomalous Scientific Data: How is Conceptual Change Impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 327–343.

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An Empirical Text of A Taxonomy of Responses to Anomalous Data in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654.

Dolezal, S. E., Welsh, L. M., Pressley, M., & Vincent, M. M. (2003). How Nine Third-Grade Teachers Motivate Student Academic Engagement. Elementary School Journal, 103, 239-267.

Dunbar, K. N., Fugelsang, J. A., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naive theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. In Lovett, M.C. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Thinking with Data. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Duron, H., Limbach B., & Wough W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework to Any Dicipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160-166.

Dwijananti & Yuliyanti. (2010). Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa melalui Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6, 108-114.

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5-24.

Facione, P. (2011). Critical Thinking. What It Is and Why Its Counts. Measured Reason and The California Academic Press.

Fine, M. & Desmond, L. (2015). Inquiry-Based Learning: Preparing Young Learners for the Demands of the 21st Century. Educator’s Voice, VIII, 2-11.

Fink, S. B. (2012). The Many Purposes of Course Syllabi: Which are Essential and Useful? Available on http://www.syllabusjournal.org/syllabus/article.pdf.

Fisher, A. (2003). Critical Thinking An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Friesen, S & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-Based Learning: A Review of the Research Literature. Paper prepared for the Alberta Ministry of Education.

Galileo Educational Network Association. (2008). Available on http://www.galileo.org/research/publications/ rubric.pdf

Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a Grip on PBL: Theory, Cases and Recommendations. Available on http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/projectbased.pdf.

Gulbahar, Y. & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing PBL and E-Portfolio Assessment in an Undergraduate Course. Journal Of Research On Technology In Education, 38(3), 309-327.

Hake, R. R., (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Retrieved from <http://lists.asu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903&L=aera-d&P=R6855>).

Hamlin, M., & Wisneski, D. (2012). Supporting the Scientific Thinking and Inquiry of Toddlers and Preschoolers Through Play. Young Children, 67(3), 82-88.

Hassard, J. (2005). The Art Teaching Science. New York: Oxford University Press

Hmelo, C., Holton, D., & Kolodner, J. (2000). Designing to Learn about Complex Systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.

Hofstein, A., Nahum T. L., & Shore R. (2001). Assessment of the Learning Environment of Inquiry-Type Laboratories in High School Chemistry. Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 193-207.

Innabi, H., & ElSheikh, O. (2007). The Change in Mathematics Teachers' Perceptions of Critical Thinking after 15 Years of Educational Reform in Jordan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(1), 45-68.

Johnson, L. & Adams, S. (2011). Challenge Based Learning: The Report from the Implementation Project. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Karsli, F., & Sahin, C. (2009). Developing worksheet based on science process skills: Factors affecting solubility. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-12.

Koray, Ö., Köksal, M. S., Özdemir, M., & Presley, A. I. (2007). The Effect of Creative and Critical Thinking based Laboratory Applications on Academic Achievement and Science Process Skills. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 377-389.

Kurzel, F., & Rath, M. (2007). Project Based Learning and Learning Environments. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 4, 503-510.

Kwaku, A. G., Barker, R., Berry, C., & Brown, C. (2014). Instructional Strategy Lessons for Educators Secondary Education (ISLES-S). East Carolina University.

Lee, C. I. & Tsai, F. Y. (2004). Internet PBL Environment: The Effects Of Thinking Styles On Learning Transfer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(1), 31-39.

Lee G., Jaesool, K., Sang, P., Jung K., Hyeok, K., & Hac, P., (2003). Development of an Instrument for Measuring Cognitive Conflict in Secondary-Level Science Classes. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603.

Lee, A.T., Hairston, R.V., Thames, R., Lawrence, T. & Herron, S.S. (2002). Using a Computer Simulation to Teach Science Process Skills to College Biology and Elementary education majors. Computer Simulations Bioscene, 28(4), 35- 42.

Lee, Y. J. (1998). The Effect of Cognitive Conflict on Students Conceptual Change in Physics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education: Korea.

Levin, B. (2008). How to Change 5000 Schools: A Practical and Positive Approach for Leading Change at Every Level. Cambridge University Press.

Limon, M., & Carretero, M. (1997). Conceptual Change and Anomalous Data: A Case Study in The Domain of Natural Sciences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 213-230.

Limon, M. (2001). On the Cognitive Conflict As an Instructional Strategy for Conceptual Change: A Critical Appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357-380.

Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquiry Within Implementing Inquiry-base Science Standard. Corwin Press.

Luong, C., Strobel, A., Wollschlager, R., Greiff, S., Vainikainen, M. P., & Preckel, F. (2017). Need for Cognition in Children and Adolescents: Behavioral Correlates and Relations to Academic Achievement and Potential. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 103-113.

Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting Project-Based Science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.

Mayer, R. (2003). Learning and Instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Mei, Y. L., Swee, E. L., Jung, C., & Leah, A. (2003). What Hong Kong Teachers and Parents Think About Thinking. Early Child Development and Care, 173(1), 147-158.

Miri, B., Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (2007). Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of Higher-order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353-369.

Newmann, F., Bryk, A., & Nagaoka, J. (2001). Authentic Intellectual Work and Standardized Tests: Conflict or Coexistence. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University: Shanghai (PR China).

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Norris, S. (1989). Can We Test Validly for Critical Thinking? Educational Researcher, 18(9), 21-26.

Parkes, J., & Harris, M. B. (2002). The Purposes of a Syllabus. College Teaching, 50(2), 55-61.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Frame Work for 21st Century Learning. www.p21.org.

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking (Concepts and Tools). The Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational Beliefs as Resources for and Constraints on Conceptual Change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, dan M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33–50). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-200.

Prayogi, S. (2013). Implementasi Model Inquiry untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. LPPM IKIP Mataram.

Qing, Z., Jing G, & Yan W. (2010). Promoting Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills by Inquiry-based Chemical Experiment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4597–4603.

Reid, J. C. (2006). Mengajar Anak Berpikir Kreatif, Mandiri, Mental dan Analitis. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.

Rudinow, J. & Barry, V. E. (2008). Invitation to Critical Thinking. New York: Thomson Higher Education.

Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning Science through Inquiry in Kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868-908.

Scriven & Paul. (2009). SLA 2009 Annual Meeting Washington DC.

Shafdar, M., Shah, I., Chairperson, QR., Afzal, T., Iqbal, A., Malik, RH, & Wing, C. (2014). Pre-labs as Advance Organizers to Facilitate Meaningful Learning in the Physical Science Laboratory. Middle Eastern and African Journal of Educational Research, 7, 30-43.

Shah, I. (2004). Making University Laboratory Work in Chemistry more Effective. Doctoral Dissertation. Glasgow: Glasgow University, Scotland.

Sriarunrasmee J, Suwannatthachote P, Dachakupt P. (2015). Virtual Field Trips with Inquiry learning and Critical Thinking Process: A Learning Model to Enhance Students’ Science Learning Outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1721-1726.

Steinhart, Y., & Wyer, R. S. (2009). Motivational Correlates of Need for Cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 608-621.

Sternberg, R. (1986). Critical Thinking: Its Nature, Measurement, and Improvement. http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED272882.pdf.

Suchman, J. R. (1962). The Elementary School Training Program. Scientific Inquiry. Urbana University of Illionis Press.

Sumarni, W., Sudarmin, & Kadarwati, S. (2013). Pembelajaran Berbasis Multimedia untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Kimia dan Keterampilan Berpikir Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(1), 69-77.

Thagard, P. (1992). The Structure of Conceptual Revolutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thaiposri P, & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Through Teaching and Learning by Inquiry-based Learning Activities Using Social Network and Cloud Computing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2137-2144.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on PBL. Retrieved from http://www.bobpearlman.org/ BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf.

Thompson, C. (2011). Critical Thinking Across The Curriculum: Process Over Output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 1-7.

Verawati, S. P. (2013). Implementasi Model Inquiry untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika pada Pokok Bahasan Hukum Hooke. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi BIOTA, 6(1), 77-86.

Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From Conceptual Development to Science Education: A Psychological Point of View. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213-1230.

Warburton, E. C. (2008). Changes in Dance Teachers’ Beliefs About Critical-Thinking Activities. Journal of Education and Human Development, 2(1), 1-16.

Wasis. (2016, Maret). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS): Konsep dan Implementasinya. Seminar Nasional PKPSM IKIP Mataram, Mataram.

Woolfolk, A. (2009). Educational Psychology. New York: Pearson

Zaman. (1996). The Use of an Information Processing Model to Design and Evaluate a Physics Undergraduate Laboratory. Doctoral Dissertation. Glasgow: Glasgow University.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

15.03.2018 — Updated on 15.03.2018

Versions

How to Cite

Prayogı, S. ., Yuanıta, L. ., & WASIS. (2018). Critical ınquiry based learning: A model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 196

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.