Construction of a chemical literacy test for engineering students

Rungrat  Thummathong; Kongsak  Thathong

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Rungrat Thummathong Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, THAILAND
Kongsak Thathong Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, THAILAND

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Chemical Literacy, Chemical Literacy Test, Construction, Engineering, Undergraduate Students

Abstract

The objective of this study was to construct an assessment instrument to assess chemical literacy among undergraduate engineering students at a university in Thailand. The subjects were 400 undergraduate engineering students who were enrolled in a basic chemistry course in 2012 from the Faculty of Engineering at Rajamangala University of Technology Isan in Khon Kaen, Kalasin, and Nakhon Ratchasima provinces. The instruments consisted of 1) a table of test specifications, and 2) assessment forms to check congruence of agreement between experts. The assessment tool was entitled ―Chemical Literacy Test (CLT)‖. The CLT had two assessment formats: 1) Multiple-choice CLT, and 2) Written CLT. The results showed that the K-R 20 of the multiple-choice test was 0.720. The Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities of the Written CLT for knowledge and understanding of the relationship between chemistry, technology and society, application of analytical thinking, application of reasoning, and moral awareness and a sense of responsibility were 0.66, 0.61, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively. The result showed that the CLT was a quality assessment tool for assessing chemical literacy of engineering students studying chemistry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1998). Blueprints for reform: Science, mathematics, and technology education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Barlia, L. (2016). Patterns of conceptual change process in elementary school students’ learning of science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(2), 49-60.

Berk, R. A. (1984). Conducting the item analysis. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), A guide to criterion- referenced test construction (pp. 97-143). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bond, D. (1989). In pursuit of chemical literacy: A place for chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 66 (2), 157-160. Retrived from http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ ed066p157. BouJaoude, S. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 139–156.

Brown, T.L., LeMay, H. E., & Bursten, B. E. (2000). Chemistry: The central science (9th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Celik, S. (2014). Chemical literacy levels of science and mathematics teacher candidates. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (1), 1-15.

Chang, S. N.  Chiu, M. H. (2005). The development of authentic assessments to investigate ninth graders’ scientific literacy: In the case of scientific cognition

concerning the concepts of chemistry and physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3 (1), 117-140.

Chin, C. C. (2005). First-year pre-service teachers in Taiwan-Do they enter the teacher program with satisfactory scientific literacy and attitude toward science? International Journal of Scientist Education, 27(13), 1549-1570.

Coll, R. K.  Taylor, N. (2009). Exploring international perspectives of scientific literacy: An overview of the special issue. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, 4(3), 197-200.

DeBoer, G. E. (2002). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6): 582-601.

Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Eubanks, L. P., Middlecamp, C. H., Pienta, N. J., Heltzel, C. E., & Weaver, G. C. (2006). Chemistry in context: Applying chemistry to society (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Gilbert, J. K., de Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D. F., & van Driel, J. H. (2002). Research and development for the future of chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. H. van Driel (Eds.). Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp.391-408). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gräber, W., Nentwig, P., Becker, H. J., Sumfleth, E., Pitton, A., Wollweber, K., & Jorde, D. (2001). Scientific literacy: From theory to practice. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education: Past, present, and future (pp. 61–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Holbrook, J.,  Rannikmae, M. (2009). Nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (11), 1374-1362.

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2003). Handbook of Primary Education Curriculum 2001. Bangkok, Thailand: Kurusapa Press.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches.( 3rd ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publication.

Lee, S. A. (2002). Planning curriculum in science. Milwaukee, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: Science and public. International Journal of Environmental  Science Education, 4 (3), 301-311.

Mateapinitkul, P. (2005). A study on scientific literacy of grade 9 students in Bangkok metropolis and its vicinity. Bangkok, Thailand: Srinakharinwirot University. (In Thai)

Moje, E. B. (1992). Literacy in the chemistry classroom: An ethnographic study of effective teaching. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, Texas.

National Research Council (NRC). (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, D C: The National Academies Press.

Norris, S. P.,  Philip, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense in central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87 (2), 224-240.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Oludipe, D., & Awokoy, J. O. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning teaching strategy on the reduction of students’ anxiety for learning chemistry. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 30-36.

Preczewski, J. P., Mittler, A., & Tillotson, W. (2009). Perspectives of German and US students as they make meaning of science in their everyday lives. International Journal of Environment  Science Education, 4 (3), 247-258.

Programme for International Students Assessment (PISA). (2008). National science assessment sample PISA and TIMSS. Bangkok, Thailand: Arunkanpim press.

Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford

University Press.

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203-225.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2-20.

Witte, D. & Beers, K. (2003). Testing of chemical literacy (Chemistry in Context in the Dutch National Examinations). Chemical Education International, 4 (1), 1-15.

Yrez, S. & Cakir, M. (2006). Critical reflective approach to teach the nature of science: A rationale and review of strategies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(2), 7-23.