The ınfluence of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) approach on science literacy and social skills

Luthfia  Irmita; Sri  Atun

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Luthfia Irmita Chemistry Education, Graduate Programe, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Sri Atun Departemen Chemistry education Faculty Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

TPACK approach, science literacy, social skills, ssenior high school students

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) approach to scientific literacy and social skills of students. The research is a quasi-experiment design of pretest and posttest control group. The research population were all students at 11th grade of natural science classes consisting the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th classes in SMAN 2 Banguntapan and the total were 118 students. The used samples were 1st and 2nd classes and had 62 students in total. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling with the 1st class of 11th grades of natural science as the control group and the 2nd class of 11th grade of natural science as the experimental group. The treatment given to the experimental group was the learning the rate of reaction by using the TPACK approach with discovery learning models, while that of the control group was learning rate of reaction by using teacher-center approach with direct instructional model. The data collection tolls were the test of science literacy, consisting social skill questionnaire and social skill observation sheet. The data analysis technique was MANOVA by using SPSS and Rasch models applying Ministep. The results showed that there were an influence of the TPACK approach to science literacy and social skills of students at the level of significance (p=0.00<0.05). The influence of the TPACK approach to science literacy (sig.= 0.00), and no influence of the TPACK approach to social skills of students of SMAN 2 Banguntapan with a significant value (sig.= 0.137).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardianto, D. & Rubini, B. (2016). Literasi sains dan aktivitas siswa pada pembelajaran IPA terpadu tipe shared. Unnes Science Education Journal, 5(1), 1153-1159.

Arends, R. (1997). Classroom Instructional and Management. New York: McGraw Hill Companies.

Balim, A. G. (2009). The effect of discovery learning on students’ success and inquiry learning skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 35, 1-20.

Bozkurt, E. (2014). TPACK levels of physics and science teacher candidates: problem and possible solutions. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15(2), 1-22.

BSNP (2006). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: BSNP.

Bybee, R. W. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issue, and pisa 2006: the 2008 paul f-brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 566-585.

Carvalho, C., Fiuza, E., Conboy, J., Fonseca, J., Santos, J., Gama, A. P. & Salema, M. H. (2015). Critical Thinking, Real Life Problems and Feedback in the Sciences Classroom. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(2), 21-31.

Cavanaugh, C. & Dawson, K. (2010). Design of online professional development in science content and pedagogy: a pilot study in Florida. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 438-446.

Chen, L. C. (2011). The effects of integrated information literacy in science curriculum on first-grade student' memory and comprehension using the super3 model. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(3), 399-411.

Combs, M. & Slaby, D. (1977). Social Skills Training with Children. New York: Plenum Press.

Darmawan, H. (2016). Pembelajaran berbasis konstruktivisme menggunakan media animasi dengan kerangka kerja TPACK dan gaya belajar terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Formatif, 6 (1), 1-11.

Drechsler, M. & Driel, J. V. (2008). Experienced teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of teaching acid-base chemistry. Research in Science Education, 38, 611-631.

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Konsep Pendekatan Ilmiah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 215-232.

Klauge, A. (2011). Interaction design and science discovery learning in the future classroom. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(3), 157-173.

Knain, E. (2005). Identity and genre literacy in high-school students' experimental reports. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 607-624.

Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Lau, K. C. (2014). The science education of the East Asian regions-what we can learn from PISA. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15(2), 1-18.

Li, Y. (2012). Pre-service science teacher in Xinjiang "scientific Inquiry"-pedagogical content knowledge research. Asia-pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 12

Matthewe, B. (2004). Promoting emotional literacy, equity and interest in science lessons for 11-14 years old, the 'improving science and emotional development project. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 281-308.

Mineo, R. S., Fazio, C. & Tarantino, G. (2005). Pedagogical content knowledge development and pre-service physics teacher education: A case study. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 235-268.

Murcia, K. (2009). Re-thinking the development of scientific literacy through a rope metaphor. Research in Science Education, 39, 215-229.

Ndongfack, M. N. (2015). TPACK constructs: a sustainable pathway for teachers’ professional development on technology adoption. Creative Education, 6, 1697-1709.

OECD. (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy A Framework for PISA 2006. USA: OECD.

OECD. (2013). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2012. USA: OECH Publishing.

Park, S. & Oliver, S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284.

Park, S., Jang, Y. & Chen, C. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Research in Science Education, 41, 245-260.

Pekdag, B. (2010). Alternative Methods in Learning Chemistry: Learning with Animation, Simulation, Video and Multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 79-110.

Qablan, A. M., Abuloum, A. & Al-Ruz, J. A. (2009). Effective integration of ICT in Jordanian schools: an analysis of pedagogical and contextual impediments in the science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 291-300.

Roth, W. (2007). Toward a dialectical notion and praxis of scientific literacy. Journal Curriculum Studies, 39(4), 377-398.

Schroeder, M., Mckeough, A., Graham, S., Stock, H. & Bisanz, G. (2009). The contribution of trade books to early science literacy: in and out of school. Research in Science Education, 39, 231-250.

Setiawati, I. & Senam. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA berbasis SETS untuk meningkatkan scientific literacy dan foundational knowledge. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 178-190.

Sinaga, P., Karniawati, I. & Setiawan, A.(2017) Improving Secondary School Students’ Scientific Literacy Ability Through The Design of Better Science Textbooks. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4),92-107

So, H. & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116.

Sugiono. (2012) Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta

Suminar, S. O. & Meilani, R. I. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning dan problem based lerning terhadap prestasi belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 84-93.

Syah, M. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Thummathong, R. & Thathong, K. (2016). Construction of a Chemical Literacy Test for Engineering Students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(3), 185-198.

Tukiran, S. & Hidayati, N. (2017). Developing Teaching Materials of Natural Product Chemistry to Increase Student's Life Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 27-41.