The  ınfluences of hybrid learning with video conference and "chemondro-game" on students' self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and achievement toward chemistry

Nur Fitriyana; Antuni Wiyarsi; Kristian Handoyo Sugiyarto; Jaslin Ikhsan

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Nur Fitriyana Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-8417
Antuni Wiyarsi Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Kristian Handoyo Sugiyarto Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9963-4331
Jaslin Ikhsan Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3415-7068

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Chemistry on android game, hybrid learning, selfefficacy, selfregulated learning, video conference

Abstract

The presence of technology is one of prominent characteristics of the 21st century learning system. This study aims to seek the influences of hybrid learning with video conference and chemistry on android game (chemondro-game) on students’ self-efficacy, selfregulated learning, and achievement toward chemistry of hydrocarbon topics. Through quasi-experiment with post-test only design, 143 eleventh grade students were selected as the research sample of the study and they were drawn from two secondary schools in Central Java, Indonesia. The sample of the study was composed of three classes based on each group's exposure to different teaching interventions. Experimental Class (EC) received hybrid learning with video conference and chemondro-game, Compared Class-1 (CC-1) was exposed to hybrid learning with video conference only, and Compared Class2 (CC-2) treated by face-to-face learning with chemondro-game only. The students’ selfefficacy, self-regulated learning, and achievement data were obtained using Scale of SelfEfficacy (SSE), Scale of Self-Regulated Learning (SSRL), and the Test on Chemistry
Hydrocarbon (TCH), respectively. In addition, an Observation Sheet on Self-Regulated Learning (OSSRL) was prepared to observe students’ activities during the learning process. MANOVA technique and descriptive statistics were performed to examine the influencesof teaching intervention on students’ self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and achievement in this instructional model. The findings revealed that the teaching intervention has significant influences on students’ self-efficacy and self-regulated learning, however no significant influence on students’ achievement. Thus, the use of video conference and chemondro-game are strongly suggested in chemistry learning due to its potential to develop self-efficacy and self-regulated learning of the students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelraheem, A. Y. (2014). Enhancing students' learning and self-efficacy through blended learning in a teachers' program. I-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 29-39.

Abdullah, M. N. (2016). Interaction effects of gender and motivational beliefs on self regulated learning: a study at ict integrated schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13, 25-41. http://mjli.uum.edu.my/images/pdf/n13mjli/2interaction.pdf

Alonso-Mencía, M. E., Alario-Hoyos, C., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Kloos, C. D. (2019): Self-regulated learning in MOOCs: Lessons learned from a literature review. Educational Review, 72(3), 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566208

Alqurashi, E. (2016). Self efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(1), 45-52. http://cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/CIER/article/download/9549/9710

Anatürk-Tombak, C. & Ateşkan, A. (2019). Science teachers’ beliefs and attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(3), 394-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/tused.10290a

Bandura, A. (1994). Self efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed). Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4, 71-81. http://www.uky.edu

Backlund, P., & Hendrix, M. (2013, September). Educational games: Are they worth the effort? A literature survey of the effectiveness of serous games. Paper presented at 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Seroius Applications.

Cazan, A. M. (2012). Self regulated learning strategies – predictors of academic adjustment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 104–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.092

Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H., & Akay, H. (2011). A phenomenological study of instructors’ experiences on an open-source learning management system. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 790-795. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.144.

Coll, S. D., & Coll, R. K. (2017). Using blended learning and out-of-school visits: pedagogies for effective science teaching in the twenty-first century. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1393658

Effeney, G., Carroll, A., & Bahr, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Key strategies and their sources in a sample of adolascent males 1. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 13, 58-74. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/70168

Eggen, P. D., & Kauchack, D. P. (2010). Educational psychology. USA: Pearson.

Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2018). Fostering of students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A study on hydrocarbon hybrid-learning and chemondro-game. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1097, 012064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012064

Hair, J., Tatham, R., Anderson, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jesey: Pearson Prentice Hall

Hung, C-M., Huang, I., & Hwang, G-J. (2014). Effects of digital game-based learning on students' self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety, and achievements in learning mathematics. J. Comput. Educ, 1(2-3), 151-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0008-8

Imaduddin, M. & Hidayah, F. F. (2019). Redesigning laboratories for pre-service chemistry teachers: from cookbook experiments to inquiry-based science, environment, technology, and society approach. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4),489-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.3

Jabbour, K. K. (2014). An analysis of the effect of mobile learning on lebanese higher education. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 1-15. http://files.eric.ed.gov

Jahjouh, Y. M. A. (2014). The effectiveness of blended e- learning forum in planning for science instruction. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(4), 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.12973/tused.10123a

Jeng, Y.-L., Wu, T.-T., Huang, Y.-M., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: a review study. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 3-11. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' self regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10, 235-252. http://www.pseve.org

Kurbanoglu , N. İ., & Akin, A. (2010). The relationships between university students’ chemistry laboratory anxiety, attitudes, and self-efficacy beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 48-59. http://ro.ecu.edu.au

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://www.depauw.edu/files/resources/krathwohl.pdf

Mooij, T., Stefens, K., & Andrade, M. S. (2014). Self-regulated and technology-enhanced learning: A european perspective. European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 519-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.5.519

Musawi, A. S. A. (2011). Blended learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 3-8. http://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/355/295

Nais, M. K., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2018). The profile of students' self-efficacy using virtual chem-lab in hybrid learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012060. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012060

Pandey, H., & Pande, P. (2014). Video conferencing: an efficient e-learning tool for distance education. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 10(2), 308-314. http://www.ijisr.issr-journals.org/

Peng, C. (2012). Self-regulated learning behavior of college students of science and their academic achievement. International Conference on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. 33, 1446–1450. Singapore: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.236

Prifti, R. (2020). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1755642

Puspita, I., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2017). Collaboration of chemistry instructional games and group investigation (GI) model to improve learning outcome in high school students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983906

Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22, 72-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024

Rivera, J. H. (2016). Science-based laboratory comprehension: an examination of effective practices within traditional, online and blended learning environments. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(3), 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1208080

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology. New York: The MC Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Shatri, Z. G. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of using information technology in learning process of students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 420-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.36

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overiew. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2-20. http://www.tused.org.

Shih, M., Liang, J-C., & Tsai, C-C. (2019) Exploring the role of university students’ online self-regulated learning in the flipped classroom: A structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1192-1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541909

Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Suana, W., Maharta, N., Nyeneng, I. D. P., & Wahyuni, S. (2017). Design and implementation of schoology-based blended learning media for basic physics 1 course. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 170-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7205

Tanti, Maison, Mukminin, A., Syahria, Habibi, A., & Syamsurizal. (2018). Exploring the relationship between preservice science teachers’ beliefs and self-regulated strategies of studying physics: A structural equation model. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(4), 79-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/tused.10247a

Tavakolizadeh, J., & Qavam, S. E. (2011). Effect of teaching of self-regulated learning strategies on self-efficacy in students. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY) (pp. 1096-1104). Mashhad: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.343

Temel, S. (2013). The effects of problem-based learning on self-regulated learning skills and the variables predictive of these skills. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences , 4, 297-302. http://www.mcser.org

Thohir, M., A., Jumadi, J., & Warsono, W. (2020). The effect of transformative blog pages to solve real-world physics problems. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 406–419. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2020.35

Ulfa, A. M., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2017). The effect of the use of android-based application in learning together to improve students' academic performance. AIP Conference Prooceedings, 1847, 050008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4983910

Uzuntiryaki, E. (2008). Exploring the sources of turkish pre-service chemistry teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 12-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2008v33n6.2

Virtanen, P., Nevgi, A., & Hannele, N. (2013). Self regulation in higher education: students' motivational, regulational and learning strategies, and their relationships to study success. Studies for the Learning Society, 3, 20-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sls-2013-0004

Vrieling, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2012). Effect of increased self regulated learning opportunities on student teachers' motivation and use of metacognitive skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 102-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n8.6

Wilson, K., & Narayan, A. (2016). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 236-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.926312

Wiyarsi, A., Fitriyana, N., & Ikhsan, J. (2019). Using technology in hydrocarbon topics: A profile on students’ self-regulated learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 961-972. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.2018.82

Yildiz, E., Şimşek, Ü., & Ağdaş, H. (2018). The effects of educational game-integrated group research method on academic achievement, attitude towards school, and retention of knowledge in teaching regulatory system. Journal of Turkish Science Education., 15(3), 91-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/tused.10239a

Zhang, J-H., Zou, L., Miao, J., Zhang, Y-X., Hwang, G-J., & Zhu, Y. (2019). An individualized intervention approach to improving university students’ learning performance and interactive behaviors in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2) 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636078

Zhao, Y., & Breslow, L. (2013). Literature review on hybrid/ blended learning. Teaching and Learning Laboratoies, 1-22. https://tll.mit.edu

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909