Improving students’ achievement in organic chemistry: A systematic review of experimental studies

Asyti  Febliza; Asep  Kadarohman; Siti  Aisyah; Norazilawati  Abdullah; Susilawati

doi:10.36681/tused.2025.020

Authors

Asyti Febliza Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Asep Kadarohman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Siti Aisyah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Norazilawati Abdullah Sultan Idris Education University
Susilawati Riau University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.020

Keywords:

Organic chemistry, instructional approaches, educational technology

Abstract

Organic chemistry is a cognitively demanding subject with persistently low student achievement. This review aimed to identify instructional strategies and educational technologies used to improve learning outcomes in organic chemistry across educational levels and learning environments. A systematic review of 40 experimental studies (2014–2023) was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The analysis revealed that group-based learning, such as cooperative and problem-based learning, is the most frequently used instructional approach to enhance academic performance and retention. Task-based and individual learning strategies were also reported but less common. E-learning technologies were most widely used in high school and classroom settings, while multimedia tools were more prevalent in higher education and laboratory contexts. Representational competence was primarily supported through the use of models. The findings suggest that instructional methods and technologies should be aligned with students' learning needs, content complexity, and context. These results offer practical guidance for improving cognitive outcomes in organic chemistry education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abukari, M. A., Samari, J. A., & Gonyalug, I. A. (2023). Improving Teaching and Learning of Organic Chemistry in Senior High Schools Using Collaborative Approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 335–350. www.ujer.org

Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Asaki, I. A. (2023). Factors contributing to teachers’ conceptual difficulties in teaching high school organic chemistry. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12433

Agustian, H. Y., & Seery, M. K. (2017). Reasserting the role of pre-laboratory activities in chemistry education: a proposed framework for their design. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00140A

Agwuudu, D., & Udu, D. A. (2017). Comparative Effects of Individualised and Cooperative Learning Instructional Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Organic Chemistry. In Electronic Journal of Science Education (Vol. 22, Issue 2). http://ejse.southwestern.edu

Akaygun, S., & Jones, L. L. (2013). Research-based design and development of a simulation of liquid–vapor equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00002H

Akhtar, M., Khalil, A., Noshaba, A., & Khalil, S. (2024). Effect of think-pair-share and choral response assessment methods on academic achievement of prospective science teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(3), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.029

Akpokiere, R., Oyelekan, O. S., & Olorundare, A. S. (2020). Development of a computer package on organic chemistry for colleges of education students in Nigeria. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 10(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2020010103

Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Hajri, S. H. (2014). Associating animations with concrete models to enhance students’ comprehension of different visual representations in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00074e

Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2020). Academic Achievement and Peer Tutoring in Mathematics: A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Education. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020929295. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020929295

Ali, S. A. (2019). Impact on Student Academic Performance of a Self-Directed Primer E-Book in a Follow-On Organic Chemistry Course. https://etd.auburn.edu

Alyahyan, E., & Düşteaör, D. (2020). Decision Trees for Very Early Prediction of Student’s Achievement. 2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS49240.2020.9257646

Angawi, R. F. (2014). Using a problem solving-cooperative learning approach to improve students’ skills for interpreting 1H NMR spectra of unknown compounds in an organic spectroscopy course. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(6), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4004436

Austin, A. C., Hammond, N. B., Barrows, N., Gould, D. L., & Gould, I. R. (2018). Relating motivation and student outcomes in general organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00182G

Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x

Baye, A., Inns, A., Lake, C., & Slavin, R. E. (2019). A synthesis of quantitative research on reading programs for secondary students. In Reading Research Quarterly (Vol. 54, pp. 133–166). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.229

Bernardi, F. M., & Pazinato, M. S. (2022). The Case Study Method in Chemistry Teaching: A Systematic Review. In Journal of Chemical Education (Vol. 99, Issue 3, pp. 1211–1219). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00733

Bhattacharyya, G. (2013). From source to sink: Mechanistic reasoning using the electron-pushing formalism. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(10), 1282–1289. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300765k

Bhattacharyya, G., & Bodner, G. M. (2005). “It gets me to the product”: How students propose organic mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(9), 1402–1407. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1402

Birundha, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom in Teaching Organic Chemistry at Standard XI. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(1), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i1.3567

Bodé, N. E., Caron, J., & Flynn, A. B. (2016). Evaluating students’ learning gains and experiences from using nomenclature101.com. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1156–1173. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00132g

Box, M. C., Dunnagan, C. L., Hirsh, L. A. S., Cherry, C. R., Christianson, K. A., Gibson, R. J., Wolfe, M. I., & Gallardo-Williams, M. T. (2017). Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Three Types of Student-Generated Videos as Instructional Support in Organic Chemistry Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00451

Çalik, M., Ültay, N., Bağ, H., & Ayas, A. (2024). A meta-analysis of effectiveness of chemical bonding-based intervention studies in improving academic performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00258f

Campbell, J., & Mayer, R. (2009). Questioning as an Instructional Method: Does it Affect Learning from Lectures? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1513

Carle, M. S., Visser, R., & Flynn, A. B. (2020). Evaluating Students’ Learning Gains, Strategies, and Errors Using OrgChem101’s Module: Organic Mechanisms--Mastering the Arrows. In Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(2), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00274J

Casselman, M. D., Eichler, J. F., & Atit, K. (2021). Advancing multimedia learning for science: Comparing the effect of virtual versus physical models on student learning about stereochemistry. Science Education, 105(6), 1285–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21675

Cha, J., Kim, H. B., Kan, S. Y., Foo, W. Y., Low, X. Y., Ow, J. Y., Bala Chandran, P. D., Lee, G. E., Yong, J. W. H., & Chia, P. W. (2021). Integrating organic chemical-based socio-scientific issues comics into chemistry classroom: expanding chemists’ toolbox. In Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, 14 (4), 699–709. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2021.2005153

Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Faculty of Education - Papers, 8. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2

Chaytor, J., Mughalaq, M., & Butler, H. (2017). Development and Use of Online Pre-laboratory Activities in Organic Chemistry to Improve Students’ Laboratory Experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 94. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00850

Chekour, M., Seghroucheni, Y. Z., Tadlaoui, M. A., & Hafid, M. M. (2022). Blended Learning and Simulation for Teaching Electrical Concepts to High School Pupils. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.165

Chien, S.-P., Wu, H.-K., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2014). An investigation of teachers’ beliefs and their use of technology-based assessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 198–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.037

Chikileva, L. S., Chistyakov, A. A., Busygina, M. V., Prokopyev, A. I., Grib, E. V., & Tsvetkov, D. N. (2023). A review of empirical studies examining the effects of e-learning on university students’ academic achievement. In Contemporary Educational Technology (Vol. 15, Issue 4). Bastas. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13418

Childs, P. E., & Sheehan, M. (2009). What’s difficult about chemistry? An Irish perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(3), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1039/B914499B

Christiansen, M. A., Lambert, A. M., Nadelson, L. S., Dupree, K. M., & Kingsford, T. A. (2017). In-Class Versus At-Home Quizzes: Which is Better? A Flipped Learning Study in a Two-Site Synchronously Broadcast Organic Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00370

Chung, C.-J., Hwang, G., & Lai, C.-L. (2019). A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010-2016 based on the activity theory framework. Comput. Educ., 129, 1–13. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.010

Collini, M. A., Rocha, L. A., Ford, J. E., Weber, R., & Atkinson, M. B. (n.d.). Characterizing and Identifying Influences on Undergraduates’ Attitudes towards Organic Chemistry. In Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24 (2), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00256F

Collini, M. A., Rocha, L. A., Ford, J. E., Weber, R., & Atkinson, M. B. (2023). Characterizing and identifying influences on undergraduates’ attitudes towards organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00256F

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249

Da Silva Júnior, J. N., Nobre, D. J., Do Nascimento, R. S., Torres, G. S., Leite, A. J. M., Monteiro, A. J., Alexandre, F. S. O., Rodríguez, M. T., & Rojo, M. J. (2018). Interactive Computer Game That Engages Students in Reviewing Organic Compound Nomenclature. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 899–902. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00793

Dai, N. Van, Trung, V. Q., Tiem, C. Van, & Hao, K. P. (2021). education sciences Project-Based Teaching in Organic Chemistry through Blended Learning Model to Develop Self-Study Capacity of High School Students in Vietnam. Education Sciences, 11(7), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070346

D’Ambruoso, G. D., Cremeens, M. E., & Hendricks, B. R. (2018). Web-Based Animated Tutorials Using Screen Capturing Software for Molecular Modeling and Spectroscopic Acquisition and Processing. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(4), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00511

Dangelo, J. G. (2014). Use of screen capture to produce media for organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(5), 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300649u

De Gale, S. (2016). The Effect of POGIL on Academic Performance and Academic Confidence. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303913188

Dibyantini, R. E., Suyanti, E. D., & Silaban, R. (2018). The Implementation of Problem Based Learning Model in Improving the Generic Science Skill of Organic Chemistry on Teacher Candidates. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.136

Dixson, L., Pomales, B., Hashemzadeh, M., & Hashemzadeh, M. (2022). Is Organic Chemistry Helpful for Basic Understanding of Disease and Medical Education? Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 688–693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00772

Dood, A. J., Dood, J. C., Cruz-Ramírez De Arellano, D., Fields, K. B., & Raker, J. R. (2020). Using the Research Literature to Develop an Adaptive Intervention to Improve Student Explanations of an SN1 Reaction Mechanism. In Journal of Chemical Education (Vol. 97, Issue 10, pp. 3551–3562). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00569

Dood, A. J., & Watts, F. M. (2022). Mechanistic Reasoning in Organic Chemistry: A Scoping Review of How Students Describe and Explain Mechanisms in the Chemistry Education Research Literature. In Journal of Chemical Education (Vol. 99, Issue 8, pp. 2864–2876). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00313

Dood, A. J., & Watts, F. M. (2023). Students’ Strategies, Struggles, and Successes with Mechanism Problem Solving in Organic Chemistry: A Scoping Review of the Research Literature. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00572

Eastwood, M. L. (2013). Fastest fingers: A molecule-building game for teaching organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(8), 1038–1041. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3004462

Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R. S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., & White, H. B. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science: A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. In Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education (Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 262–273). https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20204

Elaine Allen, I., Seaman, J., & Director, S. (2008). Staying the Course-Online Education in the United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529698.pdf

Febliza, A., Afdal, Z., & Copriady, J. (2023). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: Is Interactive Video and Interactive Web Module Beneficial? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(3), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i03.34699

Fensham, P., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003

Ferguson, R., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1039/b806225k

Finlayson, K., & Mccrudden, M. (2019). Teacher-Implemented Writing Instruction for Elementary Students: A Literature Review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1604278

Fischer, C., Zhou, N., Rodriguez, F., Warschauer, M., & King, S. (2019). Improving College Student Success in Organic Chemistry: Impact of an Online Preparatory Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(5), 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b01008

Flynn, A. B. (2015). Structure and evaluation of flipped chemistry courses: organic & spectroscopy, large and small, first to third year, English and French. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00224E

Gallardo-Williams, M. T. (2021). Designing Diverse Virtual Reality Laboratories as a Vehicle for Inclusion of Underrepresented Minorities in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00321

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175–191. www.ijres.net

Grove, N. P., Cooper, M. M., & Rush, K. M. (2012). Decorating with Arrows: Toward the Development of Representational Competence in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 844–849. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed2003934

Halverson, L., Graham, C., Spring, K., Drysdale, J., & Henrie, C. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004

Hermanns, J., & Schmidt, B. (2019). Developing and Applying Stepped Supporting Tools in Organic Chemistry to Promote Students’ Self-Regulated Learning. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00565

Hoover, G. C., Dicks, A. P., & Seferos, D. S. (2021). Upper-Year Materials Chemistry Computational Modeling Module for Organic Display Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01325

Houseknecht, J. B., Bachinski, G. J., Miller, M. H., White, S. A., & Andrews, D. M. (2019). Research and Practice Effectiveness of the active learning in organic chemistry faculty development workshops. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00137a

Hrin, T. N., Fahmy, A. F. M., Segedinac, M. D., & Milenković, D. D. (2016). Systemic Synthesis Questions [SSynQs] as Tools to Help Students to Build Their Cognitive Structures in a Systemic Manner. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9470-1

Hrin, T. N., Milenković, D. D., & Segedinac, M. D. (2016). The Effect of Systemic Synthesis Questions [SSynQs] on Students’ Performance and Meaningful Learning in Secondary Organic Chemistry Teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9620-y

Iyamuremye, A., Mukiza, J., Nsabayezu, E., Kwitonda, J. D. D., & Habimana, C. (2023). Exploration of Students’ Social Presence in Web Based Discussion for Conceptual Learning of Organic Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09997-6

Iyamuremye, A., Mukiza, J., Nsabayezu, E., Ukobizaba, F., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2021). Web-based discussions in teaching and learning: Secondary school teachers’ and students’ perception and potentiality to enhance students’ performance in organic chemistry. Education and Information Technologies, August. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10725-7

Jantrasee, R. (2022). A Comparison of the Effects of the Integration Sequence of Interactive Simulation on Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Scientific Explanation of Buffer Solutions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.167

Johnstone, A. H. (2006). Chemical education research in Glasgow in perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90021B

Johnstone, A. H., Sleet, R. J., & Vianna, J. F. (1994). An Information Processing Model of Learning: Its application to an undergraduate laboratory course in chemistry. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382163

Jordan, J. T., Box, M. C., Eguren, K. E., Parker, T. A., Saraldi-Gallardo, V. M., Wolfe, M. I., & Gallardo-Williams, M. T. (2016). Effectiveness of Student-Generated Video as a Teaching Tool for an Instrumental Technique in the Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00354

Karacop, A. (2016). Effects of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions Cooperative Learning with Models on Students’ Understanding of Electrochemical Cells. International Education Studies, 9(11), 104. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n11p104

Karadag, E. (2020). The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: a cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09612-1

Kavitha, V., & Lohani, R. (2019). A critical study on the use of artificial intelligence, e-Learning technology and tools to enhance the learners’ experience. Cluster Computing, 22, 6985–6989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2017-2

Kigozi Kahiigi, E., Ekenberg, L., Hansson, H., Tusubira, F., & Danielson, M. (2008). Exploring the e-Learning State of art. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 6, 77. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1538

Knudtson, C. (2015). ChemKarta: A Card Game for Teaching Functional Groups in Undergraduate Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 150629154025000. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500729v

Kraft, A., Rankin, E., & Arrighi, V. (2012). Using Short Videos to Supplement Lectures on Reaction Mechanisms, Organic Spectroscopy, and Polymer Chemistry. In ACS Symposium Series (Vol. 1108, pp. 209–224). https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2012-1108.ch013

Lapierre, K. R., & Flynn, A. B. (2020). An online categorization task to investigate changes in students’ interpretations of organic chemistry reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21586

Lasry, N., Mazur, E., & Watkins, J. (2008). Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1066–1069. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2978182

Lau, R. W. H., Yen, N. Y., Li, F., & Wah, B. (2014). Recent development in multimedia e-learning technologies. In World Wide Web (Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 189–198). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-013-0206-8

Lavi, R., Shwartz, G., & Dori, Y. (2019). Metacognition in Chemistry Education: A Literature Review. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800087

Leontyev, A., Houseknecht, J. B., Maloney, V., Muzyka, J. L., Rossi, R., Welder, C. O., & Win, L. (2019). OrganicERs: Building a Community of Practice for Organic Chemistry Instructors through Workshops and Web-Based Resources. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00104

Ling, Y., Zhu, P., & Yu, J. (2021). Which types of learners are suitable for augmented reality? A fuzzy set analysis of learning outcomes configurations from the perspective of individual differences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 2985–3008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10050-3

Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actions. In Cognitive Science, Cognitive Science, 18 (4): 513-549. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(94)90007-8

Malik, K., Martinez, N., Romero, J., Schubel, S., & Janowicz, P. A. (2014). Mixed-methods study of online and written organic chemistry homework. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1804–1809. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400798t

Masalimova, A. R., Erdyneeva, K. G., Kislyakov, A. S., Sizova, Z. M., Kalashnikova, E., & Khairullina, E. R. (2022). Validation of The Scale on Pre-Service Teachers’ Digital Competence to Assist Students with Functional Diversity. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12301

McCollum, B., Regier, L., Leong, J., Simpson, S., & Sterner, S. (2014). The Effects of Using Touch-Screen Devices on Students’ Molecular Visualization and Representational Competence Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1810–1817. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400674v

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23092060/

Miller, M. D., Castillo, G., Medoff, N., & Hardy, A. (2021). Immersive VR for Organic Chemistry: Impacts on Performance and Grades for First-Generation and Continuing-Generation University Students. Innovative Higher Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09551-z

Mistry, N., & Shahid, N. (2021). Design and Delivery of Virtual Inquiry-Based Organic Chemistry Experiments. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00571

Mooring, S. R., Mitchell, C. E., & Burrows, N. L. (2016). Evaluation of a Flipped, Large-Enrollment Organic Chemistry Course on Student Attitude and Achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1972–1983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00367

Morgan, R. L., Whorton, J. E., & Gunsalus, C. (2000). A comparison of short-term and long-term retention: Lecture combined with discussion versus cooperative learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27, 53–58. https://www.proquest.com

Nadelson, L. S., Scaggs, J., Sheffield, C., & McDougal, O. M. (2015). Integration of Video-Based Demonstrations to Prepare Students for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9535-3

Nsabayezu, E., Iyamuremye, A., Mukiza, J., Mbonyiryivuze, A., Gakuba, E., Niyonzima, F. N., & Nsengimana, T. (2023). Impact of computer-based simulations on students’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools of Gicumbi District in Rwanda. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3537–3555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11344-6

O’Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2017). Who says organic chemistry is difficult? Exploring perspectives and perceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3599–3620. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00748a

Ole, F. C. B., & Gallos, M. R. (2023). Impact of formative assessment based on feedback loop model on high school students’ conceptual understanding and engagement with physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.019

Omwirhiren, E. M., Ubanwa, A. O., & Uk, U. C. (2016). An Analysis of Misconceptions in Organic Chemistry among Selected Senior Secondary School Students in Zaria Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(7). www.ijern.com

Pateşan, M., Balagiu, A., & Zechia, D. (2016). The Benefits of Cooperative Learning. International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION, 22(2), 478–483. https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2016-0082

Pilcher, L. A., Potgieter, M., & Fletcher, L. (2023). Blending Online Homework and Large Class Tutorials to Provide Learning Support for Introductory Organic Chemistry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2022.2155771

Pölloth, B., Schwarzer, S., & Zipse, H. (2020). Student Individuality Impacts Use and Benefits of an Online Video Library for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00647

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Ratcliffe M. (2002). What’s difficult about A-level chemistry? Education in Chemistry, 39(3), 76–80.

Richards-Babb, M., Curtis, R., Smith, V. J., & Xu, M. (2014). Problem solving videos for general chemistry review: Students’ perceptions and use patterns. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1796–1803. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500280b

Rodemer, M., Eckhard, J., Graulich, N., & Bernholt, S. (2021). Connecting explanations to representations: benefits of highlighting techniques in tutorial videos on students’ learning in organic chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 43(17), 2707–2728. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1985743

Rollnick, M., Zwane, S., Staskun, M., Lots, S., & Green, G. (2001). Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1053–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110038576

Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. In Computers & Education (Vol. 58, pp. 136–153). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017

Ryoo, K. (Kelly), Bedell, K., & Swearingen, A. (2018). Promoting Linguistically Diverse Students’ Short-Term and Long-Term Understanding of Chemical Phenomena Using Visualizations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9739-z

Samara, N. A. H. (2016). Effectiveness of analogy instructional strategy on undergraduate student’s acquisition of organic chemistry concepts in Mutah University, Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8), 70–74. http://search.ebscohost.com/

Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 14, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

Schmidt-Mccormack, J. A., Judge, J. A., Spahr, K., Yang, E., Pugh, R., Karlin, A., Sattar, A., Thompson, B. C., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2019). Analysis of the role of a writing-To-learn assignment in student understanding of organic acid-base concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00260f

Schweiker, S. S., Griggs, B. K., & Levonis, S. M. (2020). Engaging Health Student in Learning Organic Chemistry Reaction Mechanisms Using Short and Snappy Lightboard Videos. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00619

Seery, M. K., & McDonnell, C. (2013). The application of technology to enhance chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP90006A

Shadiev, R., Wang, X., Liu, T., & Yang, M. (2023). Improving students’ creativity in familiar versus unfamiliar mobile-assisted language learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5899–5921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023891

Shattuck, J. C. (2016a). A Parallel Controlled Study of the Effectiveness of a Partially Flipped Organic Chemistry Course on Student Performance, Perceptions, and Course Completion. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00393

Shattuck, J. C. (2016b). A Parallel Controlled Study of the Effectiveness of a Partially Flipped Organic Chemistry Course on Student Performance, Perceptions, and Course Completion. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00393

Shoesmith, J., Hook, J. D., Parsons, A. F., & Hurst, G. A. (2020). Organic Fanatic: A Quiz-Based Mobile Application Game to Support Learning the Structure and Reactivity of Organic Compounds. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00492

Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2020). Students’ conceptual understanding of organic chemistry and classroom implications in the Rwandan perspectives: A literature review. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 16(2), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v16i.2.2

Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Effect of cooperative learning on chemistry students’ achievement in Rwandan day-upper secondary schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.4.2079

Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2023). Enhancing Chemistry Students’ Retention of Organic Chemistry through Intervention with Cooperative Learning in Rwanda. https://doi.org/10.37759/ICE01.2023.17

Sloffer, S. J., Dueber, B., Duffy, T. M., & Wright, W. W. (1999). Using Asynchronous Conferencing to Promote Critical Thinking: Two Implementations in Higher Education. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Soong, R., Pautler, B. G., Moser, A., Jenne, A., Lysak, D. H., Adamo, A., & Simpson, A. J. (2020). CASE (Computer-Assisted Structure Elucidation) Study for an Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Class. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00498

Springer, M. T. (2014). Improving students’ understanding of molecular structure through broad-based use of computer models in the undergraduate organic chemistry lecture. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1162–1168. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400054a

Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2019). Implementation of Game-transformed Inquiry-based Learning to Promote the Understanding of and Motivation to Learn Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0

Stieff, M. (2011). Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1137–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20438

Stull, A. T., Gainer, M., Padalkar, S., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Promoting Representational Competence with Molecular Models in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(6), 994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00194

Stull, A. T., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Model manipulation and learning: Fostering representational competence with virtual and concrete models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000077

Sukmawati, W. (2020). Techniques adopted in teaching students’ organic chemistry course for several years. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i2.38094

Supasorn, S., Suits, J. P., Jones, L. L., & Vibuljan, S. (2008). Impact of a pre-laboratory organic-extraction simulation on comprehension and attitudes of undergraduate chemistry students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806234J

Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

Teixeira, J., & Holman, R. W. (2008). A Simple Assignment That Enhances Students’ Ability To Solve Organic Chemistry Synthesis Problems and Understand Mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p88

Tran, V. D. (2014). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on the Academic Achievement and Knowledge Retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p131

Valcazar, E., Avolio, B., & Prados-Pena, M. B. (2023). Instructional methods in emergency online teaching: The case of a Latin American business school. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4421

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. The MIT Press.

Wenzel, H., & Pichler, D. (2005). Practical Evaluation Methods. Ambient Vibration Monitoring, October, 111–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470024577.ch5

Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2019). Characterization of First-Semester Organic Chemistry Peer-Led Team Learning and Cyber Peer-Led Team Learning Students’ Use and Explanation of Electron-Pushing Formalism [Research-article]. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00387

Wu, H.-K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88, 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126

Wu, S. H., Lai, C. L., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). Research Trends in Technology-Enhanced Chemistry Learning: A Review of Comparative Research from 2010 to 2019. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(4), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09894-w

Yash, P., & Singh, M. J. P. (2011). Introduction to Co-Operative Learning. In Indian Streams Research Journal (Vol. 1, Issue 2). www.isrj.net

Zedan, R. (2021). Student feedback as a predictor of learning motivation, academic achievement and classroom climate. Education & Self Development, 16, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.2.03

Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.008