The  influence of affective analogies on students’ affect for chemistry learning and attitudes

Hugo Vieira; Carla Morais

doi:10.36681/tused.2025.008

Authors

Hugo Vieira University of Porto
Carla Morais University of Porto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.008

Keywords:

Affective analogies, attitudes towards science, chemistry education, the affective dimension of learning, cognition

Abstract

Educators cannot overlook the affect’s potential for students’ educational success. In this study, affective analogies are proposed as a didactic resource to foster students’ affect for chemistry learning and positive attitudes towards the physics-chemistry subject. To examine the influence of the affective analogies on it, we grouped contents of this subject into three modules (Kinetic-molecular theory; Quantum model of the atom; Chemical elements and their isotopes) and developed analogies between chemistry and music for each (affective analogies), which were then compared to homologous undifferentiated analogies (familiar analogues without affective qualities in addition) and teaching strategies without analogies. An explanatory mixed-method design was used. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews, with a convenience sample of 147 students attending the 7^th grade of a middle school music course. The results show that the affective dimension of analogies promotes positive affect for learning at much higher levels than the familiar dimension. We proposed a mechanism through which this occurs. However, if analogies are familiar, it seems that their positive affective dimension is not as important for students’ learning levels. More than interesting, analogies should perhaps be non-aversive. As for attitudes towards physics-chemistry, teaching with affective analogies is the most beneficial strategy. This results from students’ perception that this teaching approach promoted positive affect for the study of physics-chemistry, compared to undifferentiated analogies and without analogies. Furthermore, it favoured learning and achievement in physics-chemistry, compared to the absence of analogies, because without analogies it is more difficult to understand abstract or difficult concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest process. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0

Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G., & Ritchie, S. M. (2006). Metaphor and analogy: Serious thought in science education. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie, (Eds), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 1-10). Springer.

Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer.

Bartha, P. F. (2010). By parallel reasoning: The construction and evaluation of analogical arguments. Oxford University Press.

Chin, T., & Rickard, N. S. (2012). The music use (MUSE) questionnaire: An instrument to measure engagement in music. Music Perception, 29(4), 429-446. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.29.4.429

Chinaka, T. W. (2021), The effects of “dance with fruits” analogy in alleviating alternative conceptions in acids and bases [case study of grade 11 physical sciences]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Çibik, A. S., & Yalçin, N. (2011). The effect of teaching the direct current concept with analogy technique to the attitudes of science education students towards physics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2647-2651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.163

Clement, J. J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301007

Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Springer.

Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005) The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183-198.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000276712

Curtis, R. V., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). The effects of analogies on student motivation and performance in an eighth-grade science context, IDD&E Working Paper No. 9.

Curtis, R. V., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1984). The use of analogies in written text. Instructional Science, 13(2), 99-117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23368978

Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320306

Dagher, Z. R. (2000). O caso das analogias no ensino da ciência para a compreensão [The case for analogies in teaching science for understanding]. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Ensinando Ciência para a compreensão. (pp. 180-193). Plátano Edições Técnicas.

Damásio, A. (2006). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Vintage.

Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1, (pp. 269-322). Oxford University Press.

Eskandar, F., Bayrami, M., Vahedi, S., & Ansar, V. A. (2013). The effect of instructional analogies in interaction with logical thinking ability on achievement and attitude toward chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 566-575. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00036B

Fenn, J., Tan, C-S., & George, S. (2020). Development, validation and translation of psychological tests. BJPsych Advances, 26(5), 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2020.33

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE publications.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3

Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45

Gilbert, S. W. (1989). An evaluation of the use of analogy, simile, and metaphor in science texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260405

Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219-240). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Semrud-Clikeman, M., & Muth, K. D. (1989). Analogical reasoning and problem solving in science textbooks. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), A handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 383-398). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_21

Goleman, D. (2020). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Haglund, J., & Jeppsson, F. (2012). Using self-generated analogies in teaching of thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 898-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21025

Harré, R. (1972). The philosophies of science: An introductory survey. Oxford University Press.

Harrison, A. G. (2002, December 1–5). Analogical transfer: Interest is just as important as conceptual potential [Paper presentation]. Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Harrison, A. G. (2006). The affective dimension of analogy. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 51-64). Springer.

Harrison, A. G. (2008). Teaching with analogies: Friends or Foes? In A. G. Harrison, & R. K. Coll (Eds.), Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms: The FAR guide - an interesting way to teach with analogies (pp. 6-21). Corwin Press.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Conceptual change using multiple interpretive perspectives: Two case studies in secondary school chemistry. Instructional Science, 29, 45-85.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026456101444

Hess, M.B. (2001). Models and analogies. In W. H. Newton-Smith (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science (pp. 299-307). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234-259). Oxford University Press.

Jensen, E., & McConchie, L. (2020). Brain-based learning: Teaching the way students really learn (3rd ed.). Corwin.

Lerman, Z. M. (2020). Using arts to make chemistry accessible to everybody. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1234. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p1234

Neto, A., Candeias, A. A., Rebelo, N., Varelas, D., & Diniz, A. M. (2013, September). Validade estrutural do questionário de atitudes face às ciências físico-químicas: Estudo com alunos do 9.º ano do ensino básico português [Structural validity of the questionnaire of attitudes towards the physical-chemical sciences: Study with 9th-grade Portuguese elementary school students]. Poster session presented at XII Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Newby, T. J., & Stepich, D. A. (1987). Learning abstract concepts: The use of analogies as a mediational strategy. Journal of Instructional Development, 10, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905788

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

Orgill, M. (2013). How effective is the use of analogies in science textbooks? In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness (pp. 79-100). Springer.

Orgill, M. & Bodner, G. M. (2005). The role of analogies in chemistry teaching. In N. Pimenta, M. Cooper, & T. Greenbowe, Chemists’ guide to effective teaching (pp. 90-105). Prentice-Hall

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (9), 1049-1079.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Paris, N. A., & Glynn, S. M. (2004). Elaborate analogies in science text: Tools for enhancing preservice teachers’ knowledge and attitudes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 230-247.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00033-X

Rahayu, S. (2015). Evaluating the affective dimension in chemistry education. In M. Kahveci & M. Orgill (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 29-50). Springer.

Raviolo, A., & Garritz, A. (2009). Analogies in the teaching of chemical equilibrium: A synthesis/analysis of the literature. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(1), 5-13.

https://doi.org/10.1039/B901455C

Renninger, K. A., & Su, S. (2012). Interest and its development. In R. M. Ryan, The oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 167-187). Oxford University Press.

Sarantopoulos, P., & Tsaparlis, G. (2004). Analogies in chemistry teaching as a means of attainment of cognitive and affective objectives: A longitudinal study in a naturalistic setting, using analogies with a strong social content. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(1), 33-50.

https://doi.org/10.1039/B3RP90029K

Sutton, C. (1978). Metaphorically speaking: The role of metaphor in teaching and learning science. University of Leicester Press.

Taber, K. S. (2015). Meeting educational objectives in the affective and cognitive domains: Personal and social constructivist perspectives on enjoyment, motivation and learning chemistry. In M. Kahveci & M. Orgill, (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 3-28). Springer.

Tsang, S., Royce, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal Anaesthesia, 11(Suppl1).

https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17

Taylor, N., & Coll, R. K. (2008). Using analogies to increase student interest in science. In A. G. Harrison & R. K. Coll (Eds.), Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms: The FAR guide – an interesting way to teach with analogies (pp. 32-45). Corwin Press.

Thagard, P., & Shelley, C. (2006). Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In P. Thagard (Ed.), Hot though (pp. 27-50). MIT Press.

Thagard, P. (2011). The brain is wider than the sky: Analogy, emotion, and allegory. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.556509

Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2015). On the significance of conceptual metaphors in teaching and learning science: Commentary on Lancor; Niebert and Gropengiesser; and Fuchs. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 958-965. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025312

Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.) Second international handbook of science education. Springer international handbooks of education, vol. 24. (pp. 597-625). Springer

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_41

Venville, G. J. (2008). The Focus-Action-Reflection (FAR) guide: Science teaching analogies. In A. G. Harrison & R. K. Coll (Eds.), Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms: The FAR guide - an interesting way to teach with analogies (pp-22-31). Corwin Press.

Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). Analogies in biology education: A contentious issue. The American Biology Teacher, 59(5), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450309

Vieira, H., & Morais, C. (2021). Bridging music and chemistry: A marching band analogy to teach kinetic-molecular theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 729-735.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00864

Vieira, H, & Morais, C. (2022). Musical analogies to teach middle school students topics of the quantum model of the atom. Journal of Chemical Education 99(8), 2972-2980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00289

Vilia, P., & Candeias, A. A. (2020). Attitude towards the discipline of physics-chemistry and school achievement: Revising factor structure to assess gender differences in Portuguese high-school students. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 133-150.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1706012

Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989) Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.