Design-Thinking Mindsets Facilitating Students’ Learning of Scientific Concepts in Design-Based Activities: Research Article

Luecha  Ladachart; Visit  Radchanet; Wilawan  Phothong

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Luecha Ladachart University of Phayao https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-8276
Visit Radchanet Thumpinwittayakom School
Wilawan Phothong University of Phayao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-9375

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Conceptual learning, Design-based learning, Design thinking, Pulleys, STEM Education

Abstract

Design-based learning has been internationally recognized as a key approach to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education at K-12 levels, where students are encouraged to learn STEM through the engineering design process. In this regard, it is argued that design-thinking mindsets play a crucial role in facilitating students’ learning of STEM when engaging in design-based activities. While research has indicated that design-based learning can facilitate students’ learning of scientific concepts, it is unclear whether, and which dimensions of, design-thinking mindsets support the conceptual learning of science. This study aims to explore 37 eighth-grade students’ conceptual learning and design-thinking mindsets in the context of design-based learning on pulleys. The students completed two instruments, namely a conceptual test on pulleys and a Likert-scale questionnaire measuring design-thinking mindsets, before and after the design-based learning. In a comparison between two classes of students, using the non-parametric method of Mann-Whitney U tests in each measurement, some dimensions of design-thinking mindsets that facilitate conceptual learning on pulleys were identified. These dimensions included: (a) mindfulness to the process and impacts on others; and (b) orientation to learning by making and testing. Based on these results, recommendations for the effective enactment of design-based learning in order to develop students’ scientific understanding are provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apedoe, X. S., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Learning together while designing: does group size make a difference? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9284-5

Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6

Apedoe, X. S. & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Strategies for success: uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science, 41(4), 773-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9251-4

Anderson, D. & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20176

Antonio, R. P. & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive argument-driven inquiry in teaching antimicrobial resistance: effects on students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192-217. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60

Blizzard, J., Klotz, L., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Cribbs, J., & Godwin, A. (2015). Using survey questions to identify and learn more about those who exhibit design thinking traits. Design Studies, 38, 92110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.02.002

Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high-leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102(2), 342-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21325

Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 29(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01632.x

Chiang, I-C. A., Jhangiani, R. S., & Price, P. C. (2015). Research methods in psychology (2nd Canadian edition). Victoria, B.C.: BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods

Chini, J. J. (2006). Comparing the scaffolding provided by physical and virtual manipulatives for students’ understanding of simple machines. Kansas: Kansas State University. https://krex.kstate.edu/dspace/handle/2097/6391

Chusinkunawut, K., Henderson, C., Nugultham, K., Wannagatesiri, T., & Fakcharoenphol, W. (2021). Design-based science with communication scaffolding results in productive conversations and improved learning for secondary students. Research in Science Education, 51(4), 1123-1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09926-w

Cook, K. L. & Bush, S. B. (2018). Design thinking in integrated STEAM learning: Surveying the landscape and exploring exemplars in elementary grades. School Science and Mathematics, 118(34), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12268

Dankenbring, C. & Capobianco, B. M. (2016). Examining elementary school students’ mental models of Sun-Earth relationships as a result of engaging in engineering design. International Journal of

Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 825-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9626-5

Demirbas, O. O. & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.007

Dosi, C., Rosati, F., & Vignoli, M. (2018). Measuring design mindset. [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 15th International Design Conference - Design 2018 (pp. 1991-2002). (21-24 May 2018). Dubrovnik, Croatia. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0493

Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x

Ellefson, M. R., Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Design-based learning for biology: genetic engineering experience improves understanding of gene expression.

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 292-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/10.1002/bmb.20203.

Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1018-1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040

Hess, J. L., & Fila, N. D. (2016). The manifestation of empathy with design: Finding from a servicelearning course. CoDesign, 12(1-2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1135243

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2015). Basic knowledge about STEM education. http://www.stemedthailand.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/newIntro-to-STEM.pdf.

Institute of Design at Stanford. (2019). An introduction to design thinking process guide. https://dschoolold.stanford.edu/sandbox/groups/designresources/wiki/36873/attachments/74b3d/ModeGuide BOOTCAMP2010L.pdf.

Kavousi, S., Miller, P. A., & Alexander, P. A. (2020a). Modelling metacognition in design thinking and design making. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 709-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09521-9

Kavousi, S., Miller, P. A., & Alexander, P. A. (2020b). The role of metacognition in the first-year design lab. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3471-3494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09848-4

Kelly, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework of integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.

Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experimental learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566

Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, C. D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by designTM into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2

Laeser, M., Moskal, B. M., Knecht, R., & Lasich, D. (2003). Engineering design: examining the impact of gender and the team’s gender composition. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00737.x

Lau, K. Y., Beckman, S. L., & Agogino, A. M. (2012). Diversity in design teams: an investigation of learning styles and their impact on team performance and innovation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 293-301. https://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol28-2/11_ijee2541ns.pdf

Lawanto, O. (2010). Students’ metacognition during an engineering design project. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23(2), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20084

Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.

https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20111

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A.

(2019). Design and design thinking in STEM education. Journal of STEM Education Research, 2(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00020-z

Mayer, R. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003088013286

Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2013). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. New York: Routledge.

Myneni, L. S. & Narayanan, N. H. (2012). ViPS: an intelligent tutoring system for exploring and learning physics through simple machines. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on

Computer Supported Education. (pp.73-82). Porto: SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003924700730082

Paparo, M., Dosi, C., & Vignoli, M. (2017). Towards a DT mindset tool evaluation: factors identification from theory and practice. [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design. (pp. 367-376). 21-25 August 2017, Vancouver, Canada. https://www.designsociety.org/downloadpublication/39591/Towards+a+DT+mindset+tool+evaluation%3A+factors+identification+from+t heory+and+practice

Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859-882. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280910

Schnittka, C. & Bell, R. (2011). Engineering design and conceptual change in science: addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 1861-1887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.529177

Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The design thinking mindset: an assessment of what we know and what we see in practice. Journal of Design, Business and Society, 2(2), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.2.1.71_1

Sullivan, S., Gnesdilow, D., Puntambekar, S., & Kim, J-S. (2017). Middle school students’ learning of mechanics concepts through engagement in different sequences of physical and virtual experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1573-1600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1341668

Sung, E. & Kelly, T. R. (2019). Identifying design process patterns: a sequential analysis study of design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9448-1

Tas, Y., Aksoy, G., & Cengiz, E. (2019). Effectiveness of design-based science on students’ learning in electrical energy and metacognitive self-regulation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(6), 1109-1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9923-x

Wendell, K. B. & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and scientific attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513-540.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20026

Yamane, T. (1970). Statistics – An introductory analysis (Second edition). Tokyo: John Weather Hill, Inc.

Yu, C-H. (2021). Threats to validity of research design. http://www.creative-wisdom.com/teaching/WBI/ threat.shtml.

Zohar, A. & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261