Jordanian pre-service physics teacher's misconceptions about force and motion

Authors

  • Mohammad S. Al-Rsa'ı
  • Jebreel M. Khoshman
  • Khalid Abu Tayeh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Force and motion, misconceptions, Newton’s laws, physics teachers, FCI

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the physics student-teachers misconceptions in force and motion concepts in Jordanian universities by using the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) test and to identify the cause of misconceptions related to these concepts. Also, the FCI has been used to detect whether misconceptions vary according to gender, the geographical place of the university in Jordan, and students’ attitudes towards physics as a major. The study was conducted on (97) student-teachers attending to the different universities in Jordan. Data were analyzed by using t-test and ANOVA test. The results of the study indicated that physics student-teachers grasp high misconceptions about the impetus and active force. 20% of the students correctly answered the questions related to Newton’s third law. In addition, the differences among the studied universities were not statistically significant in the FCI test (F = 1.311 and p = 0.247). Based on the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC), there was no correlation between the GPA of the students at high school and their performance in the FCI test, whereas a significant correlation was found between the GPA of the students at university and their performance on the test.  The results also demonstrated that the performance of the students on the test did not reflect significant differences in their major attitude as well as their gender at any University in Jordan. Thus, this study could be initiated with the aim of probing the Jordanian Universities attitudes towards learning Physics and their conceptual understanding of the Newtonian force concept in Physics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, W. K., Perkins, K., Podolefsky, N., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. &Wieman, C. (2006). New Instrument for Measuring Student Beliefs about Physics and Learning Physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physics Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 2(1), 1-14.

Alghamdi, A.K.H. & ElHassan, W.S. (2019). Saudi undergraduate students‟ needs of pedagogical education for energy literacy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2),521-537.

Anggoro, S., Widodo, A., Suhandi, A., & Treagust, D. F. (2019). Using a discrepant event to facilitate preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual change about force and motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15 (8). doi: 10.29333/ejmste/105275

Azman, N. F., Alia, M. & Mohtar, L. E. (2013).The Level of Misconceptions on Force and Motion among Physics Pre-Services Teachers in UPSI, 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013).

Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. & Sutcliffe, R.(1999).Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3),134–141.

Bayraktar, S. (2009). Misconceptions of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers about Force and Motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,7(2), 273 - 291.

Bogdanov, S. & Viiri, J. (1999).Students’ understanding of the force concept in Russia and Finland. In M. Komorek, H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, & A. Kross (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Kiel, August 1999.

Cayhadi, V.(2004). The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of Surabaya, Indonesia. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4), 455 – 464.

Clement, J. (1982).Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-70.

Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Demirci, N. (2001). The effects of a web-based physics software program on students’ achievement and misconceptions in force and motion concepts. Doctoral Dissertation. Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida.

Demirci, N. (2005). A Study about Students’ Misconceptions in Force and Motion Concepts by Incorporating a Web-Assisted Physics Program. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4, 40-49.

De VicoFallani F., Richiardi J., Chavez M & Achard S. (2014). Graph analysis of functional brain networks: practical issues in translational neuroscience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369:20130521. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0521

Docktor, J. & Heller, K. (2008). Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance, Physics Education Research Conference, edited by C. Henderson, M. Sabella, and L. Hsu, 15-18.

Eisen, Y. & Stavy, R. (1988).Students’ understanding of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 50(4), 208-212.

Enderstein, L. G., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Beliefs regarding force and motion: a longitudinal and cross cultural study of South African school pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 485-492.

Erickson, G.L. & Erickson, L.J. (1984). Females and Science Achievement: Evidence, Explanations, and Implications. Science Education, 68(2), 63-89.

Fadaei, A. S. &Mora, C. (2015). An Investigation about Misconceptions in Force and Motion in High School. US-China Education Review, 5(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161- 623X/2015.01.004.

Fazio,C. & Battaglia, O.R.(2018). Conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics through cluster analysis of FCI student answers. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ.17,14971517.

Gilbert, J. K., Watts, D. M. & Osborne, R. J. (1982).Students’ concepts of ideas in mechanics. Physics Education, 17(2), 62-66.

Gilbert, J.K & Zylbersztajn, A. (1985). A conceptual framework for science education: The case study of force and movement. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 107–120.

Gulcan, C.(2007). English and Turkish Pupils' understanding of decomposition. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8 (2), 1-24 .

Guven, D., Mugaloglu, E. Z., Doganca K, Z. & Cobern, W. W. (2019) Teaching Orientations of Freshman Pre-service Science Teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16 (4). 508-520. ISSN 1304-6020

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagements versus traditional methods: A six-thousandstudent survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 66, (1), 64-74.

Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64 (10), 1316-1325.

Haslam,F., & Treagust, D. (1987).Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211.

Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1994). First-year university students’ understanding of photosynthesis, their study strategies and learning context, The American Biology Teacher, 56 (5), 274-279.

Helm, H. (1980).Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education, 15 (2), 92-97.

Hestenes, D. & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller, The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502-502.

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swakhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory, The Physics. Teacher, 30 (3), 141-158.

Haussler, P. & Hoffmann, L. (2002).An Intervention Study to Enhance Girls'Interest, SelfConcept, and Achievement in Physics Classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870-888.

Kahle, J.B. & Lakes, M.K. (2003).The Myth of Equality in Science Classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, Supplement, 58 67.

Kumar, A. (1994). Physics News Bull. Indian Phys. Assoc. 25, 76-88.

Kurniawan, A. & Scott, P. (2002). Using the Force Concept Inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching. Phys. Edu. 37, 52-62.

Kurniawan, Y., Suhandi, A., & Hasanah, L. (2016). The influence of implementation of interactive lecture demonstrations (ILD) conceptual change oriented toward the decreasing of the quantity students that misconception on the Newton’s first law. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1708, pp. 70007-1-070007–5). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941180

Lee, V.E. & Burkam, D.T. (1996). Gender Differences in Middle Grade Science Achievement: Subject Domain, Ability Level, and Course Emphasis. Science Education, 80(6), 613-650.

Liew, C. W., & Treagust, D. F. (1995).A predict-observe-explain teaching sequence for learning about students’ understanding of heat and expansion of liquids. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(1), 68–71.

López-Peña, J., & Touchette, H. (2012) .A network theory analysis of football strategies. In C. Clanet (ed.), Sports Physics: Proc. 2012 Euromech Physics of Sports Conference, p. 517-528, Éditions de l'ÉcolePolytechnique, Palaiseau, (ISBN 978-2-7302-1615-9).

Martín-Blas, T., Seidel, L. & Serrano-Fernándeza, A. (2010).Enhancing force concept inventory diagnostics to identify dominant misconceptions in first-year engineering physics, European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 597–606.

Martlew, M & Connolly, K. (1996). Human Figure Drawings by Schooled and Unschooled Children in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 67 (6), 2743-2762.

May, D. &Etkina, E. (2002). College physics students' epistemological self-reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning. American Journal of Physics, 70 (12), 12491258.

Mercado, V. M. , Alarcón , H., Benegas, J., Monasterolo, R. R., Rosales F., Pesetti, M. I. & Ribotta, S. L. (2014). IDEA: An Alternative for Learning Problem Solving in the Course of Mechanics for Engineering Students at FICA, Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4), 171-180.

Mestre, J. P. (2001). Implications of research on learning for the education of prospective science and physics teachers. Physics Education, 36(1), 44-51.

Moore, D. S. & McCabe, G. P. (2003).Introduction to the practice of statistics. (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D. & Reimann, P. (2007). Saying the wrong thing: improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 144-155.

Newman, M.J.(2018). Networks, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, Y.

Osborne, R. J.& Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, (9), 825-838.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Pines, A.L. & West L.H.T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a source-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70 (5), 583- 604.

Preece, P. F. W. (1997). Force and motion: pre-service and practicing secondary science teachers language and understanding. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15 (1), 123-128.

Qian, G. & Alvermann, D. (2000).Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change learning. Reading Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 59-74.

Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M. & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student Expectations in Introductory Physics. American Journal of Physics. 66(3), 212–224.

Sadanand, N. & Kess, J. (1990).Concepts in force and motion. The Physics Teacher, 28 (8), 503–533.

Sahin, M. (2010).Effects of problem-based learning on University students’ epistemological beliefs about physics and physics learning and conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 266275.

Savinainen, A. & Scott, P. (2002a). The force concept inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning. Physics Education, 37(1), 45.

Savinainen, A. & Scott, P. (2002b).Using the force concept inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching. Physics Education, 37(1), 53–58.

Scaife, J. & Abdullah, A. (1997). Using Interviews to Assess Children's Understanding of Science Concepts. School Science Review, 78 (285), 79-84

Scott,T.F. & Schumayer, D. (2015). Students’ proficiency scores within multitrait item response theory, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020134.

Stathopoulou, C. & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring The Relationship Between Physics Related Epistemological Beliefs And Physics Understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 32(3), 255-281.

Suprapto, N., Syahrul, D. A., Agustihana, S., Pertiwi, C. A., & Ku, C.-H. (2016). College students’ conceptions of Newtonian mechanics: A case of Surabaya State University Indonesia. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 25(5), 718-731.

Taber, K. S. (2013). Personal or collective knowledge: Harry Collins' notions of tacit knowledge and of the individual as an epistemic parasite. Khimiya /Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 114-135.

Thornton, R. K. & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula, Am. J. Phys. 66, 338–352.

Trumper, R. (1999).A Longitu dinal study of physics students’ conceptions of force in preservice training for high school teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(2/3), 247–258.

Trumper, R. &Gorsky, P. (1997).A survey of biology students’ conceptions of force in preservice training for high school teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(2), 133–147.

Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K. & Christopher, J. E. (2007). A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 303-326.

Tunç, T., Çam, H.K. & Dökme, İ. (2012). A Study on Misconceptions of Senior Class Students in Some Physics Topics and the Effect of the Technique Used in Misconception Studies, Journal of Turkish Science Education. 9(3)

Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 205-221.

Wang, J., & Bao, L. (2010). Analyzing Force Concept Inventory with item response theory. American Journal of Physics, 78, 1064–1070.

Wells, J. Henderson, R. Stewart, J. Stewart, G. Yang, J. &Traxler, A. (2019).Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020122.

Yang, J. Zabriskie, C. & Stewart, J. (2019). Multidimensional item response theory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020141.

Yerrick, R. K., Doster, E., Nugent, J. S., Parke, H. M., & Crawley, F. E. (2003). Social interaction and the use of analogy: An analysis of preservice teachers’ talk during physics inquiry lessons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 443-463.

Yusof, M. M., Dalim S. F., Ibrahim, N., & Ramli, M. F. ( 2013). The level of understanding of students and teachers in the concept of force and motion, Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Science Research, ICSSR 2013 (e-ISBN 978967- 11768-1-8). 4-5 June 2013, Penang, Malaysia.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

20.12.2020

How to Cite

Al-Rsa'ı, M. S. ., Khoshman, J. M. ., & Abu Tayeh, K. . (2020). Jordanian pre-service physics teacher’s misconceptions about force and motion. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 528-543. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 328

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.