The  INNOMATTS: A model of mathematics teacher training management

Mohammad  Asıkın; Iwan  Junaedı; Adi Nur  Cahyono

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Mohammad Asıkın Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Semarang State University, Indonesia
Iwan Junaedı
Adi Nur Cahyono Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Semarang State University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

INNOMATTS, mathematics teacher professional competencies, professional development model, training model

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of the INNOMATTS (Innovative Mathematics Teaching Study) Model on content knowledge and impact on pedagogical content knowledge related to the role of teacher. The research design is an adaptation of research and development research design. Data and information were obtained from Semarang Junior High School (JHS) Mathematics Teachers as trainees. Used data collection tool is questionnaire and test. The data were analyzed descriptively narrative and quantitative calculation. The results of the study and discussion are as follows: (i) In relation to the perception, only 27% of the teachers who think that the government training programs that have been followed so far there is a post-training follow-up program; 60% of the teachers found that they only participated in training if there were programs from the government; (ii) The effectiveness of the overall training model from before to after the model implementation of teacher competence has increased. the magnitude of the normalized average gain effectiveness before and after the model implementation is 0.62 (62%) in the moderate category; while the average effectiveness of the overall model characteristic is 75.35 is included in either category. Taking into account the effectiveness of the empirical model of both process and product as a whole, the overall effectiveness of pretest and posttest, as well as the results of the RPP assessment and its implementation, it can be concluded that the implementation of the model contributes to the improvement of professional competence of JHS Mathematics teachers in Semarang City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in pāngarau/Mathematics: Best evidence synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Ardhana, W., Kaluge, L., & Purwanto, P. (2005). Pembelajaran Inovatif untuk Pemahaman dalam Belajar Matematika dan Sains di SD, SLTP, dan di SMU. Laporan penelitian hibah pascasarjana Angkatan I tahun III. Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat. Ditjen Dikti. Depdiknas.

Asia Society. (2010). Learning from the world. New York.

Burns, M. (2011). Distance education for teacher training: modes, models, and methods. Washington, DC: Education Development Center, Inc.

Butler, D., & dan Leahly, M. (2003). The TeachNet Ireland project as a model for professional development for teacher. Dublin: St Patricks College of Education, Duplin City University.

Cerbin, W., & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250 – 257.

Ditjen PMPTK. (2010). Panduan Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Pusbangprodik.

Ditjen PMPTK. (2010). Pedoman Pengelolaan Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan (PKB). Jakarta: Pusbangprodik.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & dan Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction, 8th ed. New York: Pearson.

Guskey, T. R., & Jung, L. A. (2009). Grading and Reporting in a Standards-Based Environment: Implications for Students with Special Needs. Paper presented at American Education Research Association Conference.

Hendayana, S. (2007). Lesson Study: Pengalaman IMSTEP-JICA. Bandung: UPI Press.

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuringteachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

Hooker, M. (2011). Models and Best Practices in Teacher Professional Development. Online. Avaliable from infoDEV.

Jacobs, J., Borko, H., & Roberts, S. (2009). The problem solving cycle: A model of mathematics professional development. Tersedia di http://www.colorado.edu/education/staar/documents/PSC_NCSM_013007_FNL.pdf [diakses 21 Januari 2012].

Kristin L. (2011). Preparation of Effective Teachers in Mathematics. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. USA.

Lewis, C. (2006). Lesson study in North America: Progress and challenges. Tersedia pada http://www.lessonresearch.net/res.html. [Diakses 15 Agustus 2007].

Lewis, C., Perry, R., & dan Hurd, J. (2004). A Deeper Look at Lesson Study. Academic Search Premier, 61(5), 18-22.

Lewis, C., Perry, R., Hurd, J., & O’Connell, M. P. (2002). Lesson study comes of age in North America. Tersedia pada http://www.lessonresearch.net/LS_ 06 Kappan.pdf. [Diakses pada tanggal 15 Agustus 2007].

Mark, J., Gorman, J., & Johannah, N. (2009). Keeping teacher learning of mathematics central in lesson study. NSCM Journal, 12(1), 3-11.

Marsigit. (2007). Mathematics teachers professional development through lesson study in Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(2), 141-144.

National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) (2009). Towards preparing professional and human teacher. Published by Member-Secretary, National Council for Teacher Education Wing II, Hans Bhawan, 1, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002.

Patel, R. (2011). Innovations in Teaching Mathematics. Waymade College of Education.

Pattanida P. (2004). School-Based training for in-service teacher development: atrategy for the succes of learning reform in Thailand. Paper in the Fourth Scrutinizing Committee of the Council Minister.

Penso, S. (2002). Pedagogical content knowledge: How do student teachers identify and describe the causes of their pupils’ learning difficulties? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 25-37.

Rogers. P. (2007). Teacher professional learning in mathematics: An example of a change process. Proceeding of 30Th annual conference of Math Education Research Group Of Australasia MERGA Inc.

Saad, N. S. (2008). Teaching mathematics in secondary schools: theories and practices. Perak: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI).

Sugiyono, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Taylor, E.V. (2011.) Supporting children’s mathematical understanding: profesional development focused on out-of-school practices. Journal Math Teacher Education, 15(4), 271-291.

Volker, U. (2010). Systemic Innovations of Mathematics Education with Dynamic Worksheet as Catalysts. Proceedings of CERME 6 page 1280-1289. Lyon France INRP 2010.

West, L., Hanlon, G., Tam, P., & Novelo, M. (2007). Building Coaching Capacity Through Lesson Study. NSCM Journal, 1(1), 26-33.