The effects of  a Systematic Approach to Solve  Real-Life Inventive Problems in Science Class

Nilüfer Demirci Saygı; Fatma Şahin

doi:10.36681/

Authors

Nilüfer Demirci Saygı Sakarya University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9729-170X
Fatma Şahin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Systematic inventive problem solving (SIPS), Inventive Problem, Light, ASIT

Abstract

Günümüzde eğitim programları, sürdürülebilir kalkınma için mevcut ve gelecekteki beceri ihtiyaçlarına göre şekillenmektedir. Bu becerilerden biri yaratıcı problem çözmedir. Mühendislik, patent, buluş, yenilik, teknoloji, bilim, matematik ve problem çözmeden türetilen sistematik bir yol olan sistematik yaratıcı problem çözme (SIPS), gerçek hayattaki yaratıcı problemleri çözmek için kullanılabilir. SIPS, problemin dünyasını veya çevresini keşfederek yenilikçi çözümlere erken karar vererek yaklaşır. Bu çalışma, Hafif konular için fen dersinde yaratıcı problem çözmeyi geliştirmek için SIPS tabanlı bir öğretim metodolojisinden elde edilen bulguları sunar. Bu çalışmada, SIPS'nin gerçek hayattaki yaratıcı problemlerin çözümü üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmek için yarı deneysel tasarım kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar iki gruba ayrılmış 78 yedinci sınıf ortaokul öğrencisiydi. her grupta aynı sayıda öğrenci vardı. Veriler, Buluşsal Problem-Test (IP-T), öğrencilerin etkinliklerinin belgelenmesi ve görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonucu, 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin SIPS'yi öğrenmede herhangi bir zorluk yaşamadıklarını göstermektedir. Bilinen ve bilinmeyen konulardaki problemlere yaratıcı çözümler üretilmesine olumlu katkı sağlamıştır.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, B., & Gökçek, T. (2012). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına genel bir bakış. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(42), 1-21. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/esosder/issue/6156/82721

Agbedahin, A. V. (2019). Sustainable development, education for sustainable development, and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 669-680.

Barak, M., & Mesika, P. (2007). Teaching methods for inventive problem-solving in junior high school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 19–29.

Barak, M., & Goffer, N. (2002). Fostering systematic innovative thinking and problem solving: lessons education can learn from industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 227-247.

Barak, M. (2003). Impacts of Learning Systematic Inventive Thinking Methods. In J. R. Dakers and M. J. de VriesPupils (Ed.), PATT-13) International Research Conference 3003 (pp. 170-174). https://www.iteea.org/File.aspx id=40485&v=e17b5085

Barak, M. (2004). Systematic approaches for inventive thinking and problem-solving: implications for engineering education. Int. J. Engng Ed., 20(4), 612-618.

Barak, M. (2006). Teaching methods for systematic inventive problem-solving: evaluation of a course for teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140600811668

Barak, M. (2009). Idea focusing versus idea generating: A course for teachers on inventive problem solving. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(4), 345-356.

Barak, M. (2013). Impacts of learning inventive problem-solving principles: students’ transition from systematic searching to heuristic problem solving. Instructional Science, 41(4), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9250-5

Belski, I. (2009). Teaching thinking and problem solving at university: a course on TRIZ. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(2), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00518.x

Breiner, J., Harkness, M., Johnson, C.C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3– 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x

Bybee, R. (2010). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898909

Çepni, S. (2014). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş (7. ed.). Celepler Matbaacılık.

Chang, Y-S., Chien, Y-H., Yu, K-C., Chu, Y-H., & Chen, M. Y-C. (2016). Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.003.

Chen, X. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. (NCES No. 2009-161). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009161.pdf

Cropley, A.J. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13

De Bono, E. (1991). The cognitive research trust (CoRT) thinking program. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 1(2), 105-117.

De Bono, E. (1976). Teaching thinking. Maurice Temple Smith.

De Bono, E. (1983). De Bono’s thinking course. London: BBC.

Deacon, S.A. (2000). Using divergent thinking exercises within supervision to enhance therapist creativity. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 11(2), 67-73.

Demirci Sayğı, N., & Şahin, F. (2017). The effects of systematic inventive problem solving activities on theoretical, experimental and real life problem solving. Sakarya University Journal of Education 7(2), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.335785 Eberle, B. F. (1997). SCAMPER. Waco, TX: Prufrock.

Ergül, N. R., & Çalış, S. (2021). Examination of high school students' engineering design skills: Example of electromagnetism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 765-780.

Glenn, R.E. (1997). SCAMPER for student creativity. Education Digest, 62(6), 67-69.

Goldenberg, J., & Mazurski, D. (2002). Creativity in product innovation. Cambridge University Press.

Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Washington Congressional Research Service (CRS) report for congress, R42642. http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/STEM-EducationPrimer.pdf

Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Creativity requires a mix of skills. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 80-83. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb13/vol70/num05/CreativityRequires-a-Mix-of-Skills.aspx

Güven, Y. (2008). Farklı düşünme etkinlikleri (SCAMPER). Kök Yayıncılık.

Hawkins, R. (2002). Ten lessons for ICT and education in the developing world. In G. S. Kirkman, P. K. Corneliuous, J. Sachs, and K. Schwab. (Ed.), The Global Information Technology Report 20012002 Readiness for the Networked World (pp. 38–45). Oxford University Press.

Higuera Martínez, O.I., Fern{ndez-Samac{, L., & Serrano C{rdenas, L.F. (2021) Trends and opportunities by fostering creativity in science and engineering: a systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(6), 1117-1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1974350

Horowitz, R. (2001a). From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 steps. TRIZ Journal. Retrieved 18.11.2014 from https://triz-journal.com/triz-asit-4-steps/

Horowitz, R. (2001b). ASIT’s five thinking tools with examples. TRIZ Journal. Retrieved 18.11.2014 from https://triz-journal.com/asits-five-thinking-tools-examples/

Horowitz, R. (2001c). Using ASIT to develop new products. TRIZ Journal. Retrieved 18.11.2014 from https://triz-journal.com/using-asit-develop-new-products/

Kapucu, S., & Yıldırım, N. (2007). Mühendislik öğrencilerine TRIZ yenilikçi problem çözme tekniklerinin öğretilmesi. Mühendis ve Makine Dergisi, 572(48), 23-27.

Karataş, S., & Özcan, S. (2010). Yaratıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin yaratıcı düşünmelerine ve proje geliştirmelerine etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 225-243.

Kim, A. M., Speed, C. J., & Macaulay, J. O. (2019). Why don't students recognize creative learning opportunities in a biomedical science program? Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(6), 656-668. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21295

Kurtuluş, N. (2012). Yaratıcı düşünmeye dayalı öğretim uygulamalarının bilimsel yaratıcılık bilimsel süreç becerileri ve akademik başarıya etkisi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Karadeniz Technical University.

Lampă, I., Greculescu, A., & Todorescu, L. L. (2013). Education for sustainable development–training the young generation for the future. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 120-124.

Langley, D., Arieli, R., & Eylon, B.S. (2010, August, 23-26). Enhancing four science learning dimensions: the physics & industry experience. Girep Conference, Reims, France.

Liu, W., Tan, R., Peng, Q., Li, H., Li, Z.,Yang, B. (2020). Impact of TRIZ learning on performance in biologically inspired design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 974-987.

Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: a guide for researchers (NCEE 2017-4023). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573325.pdf

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Mazur, G. (1995). Theory of inventive problem solving TRIZ. Mazur. Retireved 20.04.2010 from http://www.Mazur.Net/Triz/

McGuinness, C. (2005). Teaching thinking: theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Special Monograph Series, Pedagogy – Learning for Teaching, 3, 107– 126.

Moon, S., Ha. C., & Yang, J. (2012). Structured idea creation for improving the value of construction design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(7), 841-853.

Mumford, M.D., Medeiros, K.E., & Partlow, P.J. (2012). Creative thinking: processes, strategies and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.003

Nneji B. (2022). Why education systems should build environmental ethics into every subject. The conversation. Retrieved 17.09.2022 from (https://theconversation.com/why-education-systemsshould-build-environmental-ethics-into-every-subject-173078).

Öncü, T. (1992). Yaratıcılığın betimlenmesi ve yaratıcılık üzerine çevresel etkiler. Ankara Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14, 255-264.

Osborn, J. (2004). Biography: Alex F. Osborn. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 70-72.

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.

Savransky, S.D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. CRC Press.

Serrat, O. (2017). The SCAMPER technique. Knowledge Solutions (pp. 311–314). Springer.

Silverstein, D., Samuel, P., & Decarlo, N. (2009). The innovators toolkit 50+ techniques for predictable and sustainable organic growth. Breakthrough Management Group International.

Stern, Y., Biton, I., & Ma’or, Z. (2006). Systematically creating coincidental product evolution case studies of the application of the systematic inventive thinking (SIT) method in the chemical industry. Journal of Business Chemistry, 3(1), 13-21.

Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Soldi, R., Cavallini, S., Friedl, J., Volpe, M., Zuccaro, C. (2016). A new skills agenda for Europe. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium. DOI:10.2863/708323.

The Royal Society (Great Britain) (2010). The scientific century: securing our future prosperity. The Royal Society. http://royalsociety.org/the-scientific-century/

Thomas, B., & Watters, J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002

Turner, S. (2009). ASIT—a problem solving strategy for education and eco-friendly sustainable design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 221–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9080-6

Uzel, L., & Bilici, S. C. (2022). Engineering design-based activities: investigation of middle school students’ problem solving and design skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 163-179.

Wong, Y.L., & Siu, K.W.M. (2011). A model of creative design process for fostering creativity of students in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(4), 437450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9162-8

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin.