Exploring grade 11 physical science teachers’ perceptions of practical work in mankweng circuit, South Africa

Authors

  • Israel Kibirige Prof. Dr., University of Limpopo, P/Bag X1106, Sovenga
  • David Maponya University of Limpopo, P/Bag X1106, Sovenga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.53

Keywords:

Practical work, Perceptions, Inquiry, Demonstration, Science concepts

Abstract

Practical work is critical to understanding science concepts. A case study was carried out to understand teachers’ perceptions regarding practical work in Mankweng Circuit, South Africa. Four Grade 11 Physical Science teachers from different high schools were purposively selected. Data were collected through interviews, classroom observations, and teachers’ portfolios. Results show that teachers’ had different perceptions, enactment and motives regarding practical work. Teachers used demonstrations, narratives, and structured investigations to teach practical work, which deprived learners’ science process skills. All teachers recorded one practical work in a term to fulfill the national Curriculum Policy Statement (CAPS) requirements. The study contributes to the literature on teachers’ perceptions regarding practical work and gives insight into the implementation of practical work in the classrooms. The study recommends developing teachers’ professional development programs that focus on how to design and implement quality practical work lessons, and to assess process skills during practical work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahams, I. (2009). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (17), 2335-2353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802342836

Aladejana, F. & Aderibigbe O. (2007). Science Laboratory Environment and Academic Performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16 (6): https://doi.org 500-506. DOI 10.1007/s10956-007-9072-4.

Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019). Teaching practices linked to the implementation of inquiry‐based practical work in certain science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21469

Ameh, I-Ei, Daniel, B. P., & Akus, Y. (2007). Research and Methods in the Social Sciences. Ankpa: Rowis press.

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Teaching, Learning and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, USA. Addison Wesley Longman.

Anyanwu, J.C. (2013) ‘The correlates of poverty in Nigeria and policy implications’, African Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 23–52.

Anza, N., Bibiso, M., Mohammad, A., & Kuma, B. (2016). Assessment of Factors Influencing Practical Work in Chemistry: A Case of Secondary Schools in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 6, 53-63. https://doi.org/ 10.5815/ijeme.2016.06.06

Atwater, M. M., Russell, L.M., & Butler, B.M. (2014). Preparing teachers for equity and social justice. New York: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.

Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education, M.A: Harvard University Press.

Bozkurt, A. E., & Ercan, S. (2016). STEM education program for science teachers: perceptions and competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13 (Special Issue), 103 -117.doi: 10.12973/tused.10174a

Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2018). Reprint of readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.014

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Cossa, E. F. R. (2007). A case study of Practical Work in a Cell Biology Course at the Eduardo Mondlane University in Mozambique. Doctoral Thesis. University of the Western Cape, South Africa, Cape Town.

Cossa, E.F.R., & Uamusse, A.A. (2015). Effects of an in-service program on biology and chemistry teachers’ perception of the role of laboratory work. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 152-160. https://doi.org/ : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.656

Cossa, E., Holtman, L., Ogunniyi, M., & Mikalsen, Ø. (2008). Assessing students’ understanding of cell division in an undergraduate biology course: a qualitative perspective. African Journal of Research in SMT Education, 12(2), pp. 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10288457.2008.10740632

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Deore, K. V. (2012). The educational advantages of using internet. International educational E-journal, 1(2), 111-112.

Department of Education, DBE. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) Physical Sciences. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Diefendorff, J. M., & Richard, E. M. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of emotional display rule perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2): 284–294.

Godwin, O., Adrian, O., & Johnbull, E. (2015). The impact of physics laboratory on students offering physics in Ethiopia West local Government Area of Delta State. Academic Journals, 10 (7), 951-956.https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1943

Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. California Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., & Mukminin, A. (2019). The Inquiry-Based Teaching Instruction (IBTI) in Indonesian secondary education: what makes science teachers successful enact the curriculum? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 18-33.

El Takach, S. & Yacoubian, H.A. (2020). Science teachers’ and their students’ perceptions of science and scientists. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 8(1), 65-75.

Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2019). The development of a resource guide in assessing students’ science manipulative skills at secondary schools. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 240-252.

Flick, L.B. & Lederman, N.G. (eds.) (2006). Scientific inquiry and nature of science: implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Springer Publisher.

Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5

Harlen, W. (2006). Teaching, learning and assessing science 5-12 (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722

Hofstein, A. and Maalmlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), pp. 105-107.

Hofstein, A., Kipnis, M., & Abrahams, I. Z. (2013). How to learn in and from the chemistry laboratory. In A. Hofstein & I. Eilks (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A study book (pp. 153-182). Rotterdam: Sense.

İlter, İ. (2017). Concept-teaching practices in social studies classrooms: Teacher support for enhancing the development of students’ vocabulary. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 1135-1164. https//doi.org/ 10.12738/estp.2017.4.0343

Ituma, M., Twoli, N., & Khatete, D. (2015). Chemistry teachers’ role in changing practical work from simple ‘Hands On’ activities to more of ‘Minds on’ activities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 10(1), 110-118.

Joebagio, H., & Akhyar, M. (2018). Teachers’ perception on digital teaching material development in social science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special), 13-21. doi 10.12973/tused.10252a

Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 10(4), 439-452.

Kanamugire, C., Yadav, L., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2019). Tutors’ perceptions about science curriculum reforms and challenges for their implementation in Teacher Training Colleges in Rwanda. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(1), 101-116. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i1.9

Kang, N. H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 14-165.

Kenneth, A. G. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ conception of an effective science teacher: the case of initial teacher training. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 40-61. doi: 10.36681

Kibirige, I. & Tsamago, H. (2013). Learners’ Performance in Physical Sciences Using Laboratory Investigations. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4): 425-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2013.11890104

Kibirige, I., & Teffo, W.L. (2014). Actual and ideal assessment practices in South African Natural Sciences Classrooms. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890162

Kousloglou, M., & Syrpi, M. (2018). Perceptions of secondary school teachers on the use of handheld devices in schools as learning tools. In 5th Pan-Hellenic Educational Conference of Central Macedonia ‘ICT use and integration in educational practice’ (pp. 39–62), April 27–29, 2018 (in Greek)

Llewellyn, D. (2013). Teaching high school science through inquiry and argumentation. California: Corwin Press.

May, T. (2011). Social research issues, methods and process (3rd ed.). Buckingham Philadelphia: Open University Press.

McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in Education Evidence Based Inquiry (7th ed.). Edinburgh Gate: Pearson.

Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. In high school science laboratories: role and vision. National academy of sciences, Washington, DC. October 2004.

Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Courtois, C., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2014). A qualitative study about the implementation of tablet computers in secondary education: The teachers’ role in this process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 481-488

Mudau, A.V., & Tabane, R. (2015). Physical science teacher’s perspectives of the types and nature of practical work. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(3), 327-338.

Mundi, N. E. (2006). The state of students’ academic achievement in secondary school agricultural science in Kogi State. Teacher Education Journal (TEJ), 12(1), 14-19.

Nikolopoulou, K., & Kousloglou, M. (2019). Mobile learning in science: A study in secondary education in Greece. Creative Education, 10(6), 1271-1284. Doi 10.4236/ce.2019.106096.

Olaitan, S. O. (1984). Agricultural Education in the Tropics – Methodology for Teaching Agriculture. London: Macmillan Publishers.

Onwu, G. O. M., & Kyle, W. C., Jr., (2011). Increasing the socio-cultural relevance of science education for sustainable development. African Journal of Research in MST Education, 15(3), 2-26.

Osborne, J (2011). Science teaching methods: A rationale fpr practices. School science Review, 98(343). Oxford, R. (1997). “Constructism: Shape-Shifting, sunstance, and teacher education: Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 35-66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7201_3

Park, J, Abrahams, I., & Song, J. (2016). Unintended knowledge learnt in primary science practical lessons. International Journal of Science Education, DOI. http://dx.doi.org /10.1080/09500693.2016.1250968

Parkinson, J. (2004). Improving secondary science teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Kolucki, B. & Lemish, D. (2011). Communicating with Children Principles and Practices to Nurture, Inspire, Excite, Educate and Heal. UNICEF. From http://www.unicef.org/ cbsc/files/ CwC_ Web.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2017.

Parsons, S.A., Hutchison, A.C., Hall, L.A., Parsons, A.W., Ives, S.T. & Leggett, A.B. (2019). U.S. teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 82(1), 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.006

Pekmenz, E., Johnson, P. & Gott, R. (2005). Teachers’ understanding of the nature and purpose of practical work. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500068401

Petrus, R. M. (2018). A comparison of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the factors contributing to poor performance in physical sciences: A case of South Africa. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(4), 93-103. doi: 10.12973/tused.10248a

Ping, I. L. L., & Osman, K. (2019). Laboratory-Modified Argument Driven Inquiry (LAB-MADI) module: Content validity process. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 129-140. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/index.php/jpii

Ramnarain, U., & Fortus, D. (2013). South African physical sciences teachers’ perceptions of new content in a revised curriculum. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-15. http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za

Ramnarain, U., (2014). Teachers' perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and teacher education, 38, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.003

Ramnarain, U., & Hlatswayo, M. (2018). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38(1).1-10. DOI: 10.15700/saje.v38n1a1431

Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground–A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351

Salkind, N.J. (2003). Exploring research (5th ed.). Pearson. Prestige Hall.

Sani, S.S. (2014). Teachers’ purposes and practices in implementing practical work at the lower secondary school level. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 116, 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.338

Science Community Representing Education (SCORE) (2008). Practical work in science: a report and proposal for a strategic framework. Retrieved 1 March 2015, from http://www.score education. org/media/3668/report. pdf.

Sharpe, R., & Abrahams, I. (2020). Secondary school students’ attitudes to practical work in biology, chemistry and physics in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1597696

Stoffels, N.T. (2005). There is a worksheet to be followed": A case study of a science teacher's use of learning support texts for practical work. African Journal of Research in SMT Education, 9(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2005.10740585

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage.

Swain, J., Monk, M., & Johnson, S. (1999). A comparative study of attitudes to the aims of practical work in science education in Egypt, Korea and the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (12), 1311-1324 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290093

Tafa, B. (2012). Laboratory activities and students practical performance: the case of practical organic chemistry. African Journal of Chemical Education, 2(3), 47-76.

Thobela, N.Q.M., & Mtapuri, O. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of the integrated quality management system: lessons from Mpumalanga, South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-14. http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za

Toplis, R., & Allen, M. (2012). ‘I do and I understand?’ Practical work and laboratory use in United Kingdom schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8 (1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.812a

Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell, Victoria: Acer Press.

Utete, C. N., & Ilukena, A. M. (2019). The importance of practical work in the teaching and learning of integrated natural sciences and health education at the University of Namibia, Rundu Campus. The Namibia CPD Journal for Educators, 5, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.32642/ncpdje.v5i0.1253

Ward, H., Roden, J., Hewlett, C., & Foreman, J. (2005). Teaching science in primary classroom. A practical guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Waller, V., Farquharson, K., & Dempsey, D. (2016). Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital world. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Watt, James H., Van den Berg, S. A. (1995) Research Methods for Communication Science. Massachusetts: A and Bacon A Simon & Schuster Company.

Watts, A. (2013). The assessment of practical science: a literature review. Cambridge Assessment.

Wei, B., & Li, X. (2017). Exploring science teachers’ perceptions of experimentation: implications for restructuring school practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1775-1794.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1351650

Whyley, D. (2018). Barriers to mobile learning advancements in the United Kingdom. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 807-816). Cham: Springer.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

26.03.2021

How to Cite

Kibirige, I., & Maponya, D. . (2021). Exploring grade 11 physical science teachers’ perceptions of practical work in mankweng circuit, South Africa. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.53

Similar Articles

1-10 of 464

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.