Exploring grade 11 physical science teachers’ perceptions of practical work in mankweng circuit, South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.53Keywords:
Practical work, Perceptions, Inquiry, Demonstration, Science conceptsAbstract
Practical work is critical to understanding science concepts. A case study was carried out to understand teachers’ perceptions regarding practical work in Mankweng Circuit, South Africa. Four Grade 11 Physical Science teachers from different high schools were purposively selected. Data were collected through interviews, classroom observations, and teachers’ portfolios. Results show that teachers’ had different perceptions, enactment and motives regarding practical work. Teachers used demonstrations, narratives, and structured investigations to teach practical work, which deprived learners’ science process skills. All teachers recorded one practical work in a term to fulfill the national Curriculum Policy Statement (CAPS) requirements. The study contributes to the literature on teachers’ perceptions regarding practical work and gives insight into the implementation of practical work in the classrooms. The study recommends developing teachers’ professional development programs that focus on how to design and implement quality practical work lessons, and to assess process skills during practical work.
Downloads
References
Abrahams, I. (2009). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (17), 2335-2353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802342836
Aladejana, F. & Aderibigbe O. (2007). Science Laboratory Environment and Academic Performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16 (6): https://doi.org 500-506. DOI 10.1007/s10956-007-9072-4.
Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019). Teaching practices linked to the implementation of inquiry‐based practical work in certain science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21469
Ameh, I-Ei, Daniel, B. P., & Akus, Y. (2007). Research and Methods in the Social Sciences. Ankpa: Rowis press.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Teaching, Learning and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, USA. Addison Wesley Longman.
Anyanwu, J.C. (2013) ‘The correlates of poverty in Nigeria and policy implications’, African Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 23–52.
Anza, N., Bibiso, M., Mohammad, A., & Kuma, B. (2016). Assessment of Factors Influencing Practical Work in Chemistry: A Case of Secondary Schools in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 6, 53-63. https://doi.org/ 10.5815/ijeme.2016.06.06
Atwater, M. M., Russell, L.M., & Butler, B.M. (2014). Preparing teachers for equity and social justice. New York: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education, M.A: Harvard University Press.
Bozkurt, A. E., & Ercan, S. (2016). STEM education program for science teachers: perceptions and competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13 (Special Issue), 103 -117.doi: 10.12973/tused.10174a
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2018). Reprint of readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.014
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cossa, E. F. R. (2007). A case study of Practical Work in a Cell Biology Course at the Eduardo Mondlane University in Mozambique. Doctoral Thesis. University of the Western Cape, South Africa, Cape Town.
Cossa, E.F.R., & Uamusse, A.A. (2015). Effects of an in-service program on biology and chemistry teachers’ perception of the role of laboratory work. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 152-160. https://doi.org/ : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.656
Cossa, E., Holtman, L., Ogunniyi, M., & Mikalsen, Ø. (2008). Assessing students’ understanding of cell division in an undergraduate biology course: a qualitative perspective. African Journal of Research in SMT Education, 12(2), pp. 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10288457.2008.10740632
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Deore, K. V. (2012). The educational advantages of using internet. International educational E-journal, 1(2), 111-112.
Department of Education, DBE. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) Physical Sciences. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Diefendorff, J. M., & Richard, E. M. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of emotional display rule perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2): 284–294.
Godwin, O., Adrian, O., & Johnbull, E. (2015). The impact of physics laboratory on students offering physics in Ethiopia West local Government Area of Delta State. Academic Journals, 10 (7), 951-956.https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1943
Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. California Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., & Mukminin, A. (2019). The Inquiry-Based Teaching Instruction (IBTI) in Indonesian secondary education: what makes science teachers successful enact the curriculum? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 18-33.
El Takach, S. & Yacoubian, H.A. (2020). Science teachers’ and their students’ perceptions of science and scientists. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 8(1), 65-75.
Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2019). The development of a resource guide in assessing students’ science manipulative skills at secondary schools. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 240-252.
Flick, L.B. & Lederman, N.G. (eds.) (2006). Scientific inquiry and nature of science: implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Springer Publisher.
Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
Harlen, W. (2006). Teaching, learning and assessing science 5-12 (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
Hofstein, A. and Maalmlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), pp. 105-107.
Hofstein, A., Kipnis, M., & Abrahams, I. Z. (2013). How to learn in and from the chemistry laboratory. In A. Hofstein & I. Eilks (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A study book (pp. 153-182). Rotterdam: Sense.
İlter, İ. (2017). Concept-teaching practices in social studies classrooms: Teacher support for enhancing the development of students’ vocabulary. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 1135-1164. https//doi.org/ 10.12738/estp.2017.4.0343
Ituma, M., Twoli, N., & Khatete, D. (2015). Chemistry teachers’ role in changing practical work from simple ‘Hands On’ activities to more of ‘Minds on’ activities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 10(1), 110-118.
Joebagio, H., & Akhyar, M. (2018). Teachers’ perception on digital teaching material development in social science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special), 13-21. doi 10.12973/tused.10252a
Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 10(4), 439-452.
Kanamugire, C., Yadav, L., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2019). Tutors’ perceptions about science curriculum reforms and challenges for their implementation in Teacher Training Colleges in Rwanda. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(1), 101-116. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i1.9
Kang, N. H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 14-165.
Kenneth, A. G. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ conception of an effective science teacher: the case of initial teacher training. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 40-61. doi: 10.36681
Kibirige, I. & Tsamago, H. (2013). Learners’ Performance in Physical Sciences Using Laboratory Investigations. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4): 425-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2013.11890104
Kibirige, I., & Teffo, W.L. (2014). Actual and ideal assessment practices in South African Natural Sciences Classrooms. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890162
Kousloglou, M., & Syrpi, M. (2018). Perceptions of secondary school teachers on the use of handheld devices in schools as learning tools. In 5th Pan-Hellenic Educational Conference of Central Macedonia ‘ICT use and integration in educational practice’ (pp. 39–62), April 27–29, 2018 (in Greek)
Llewellyn, D. (2013). Teaching high school science through inquiry and argumentation. California: Corwin Press.
May, T. (2011). Social research issues, methods and process (3rd ed.). Buckingham Philadelphia: Open University Press.
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in Education Evidence Based Inquiry (7th ed.). Edinburgh Gate: Pearson.
Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. In high school science laboratories: role and vision. National academy of sciences, Washington, DC. October 2004.
Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Courtois, C., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2014). A qualitative study about the implementation of tablet computers in secondary education: The teachers’ role in this process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 481-488
Mudau, A.V., & Tabane, R. (2015). Physical science teacher’s perspectives of the types and nature of practical work. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(3), 327-338.
Mundi, N. E. (2006). The state of students’ academic achievement in secondary school agricultural science in Kogi State. Teacher Education Journal (TEJ), 12(1), 14-19.
Nikolopoulou, K., & Kousloglou, M. (2019). Mobile learning in science: A study in secondary education in Greece. Creative Education, 10(6), 1271-1284. Doi 10.4236/ce.2019.106096.
Olaitan, S. O. (1984). Agricultural Education in the Tropics – Methodology for Teaching Agriculture. London: Macmillan Publishers.
Onwu, G. O. M., & Kyle, W. C., Jr., (2011). Increasing the socio-cultural relevance of science education for sustainable development. African Journal of Research in MST Education, 15(3), 2-26.
Osborne, J (2011). Science teaching methods: A rationale fpr practices. School science Review, 98(343). Oxford, R. (1997). “Constructism: Shape-Shifting, sunstance, and teacher education: Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 35-66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7201_3
Park, J, Abrahams, I., & Song, J. (2016). Unintended knowledge learnt in primary science practical lessons. International Journal of Science Education, DOI. http://dx.doi.org /10.1080/09500693.2016.1250968
Parkinson, J. (2004). Improving secondary science teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Kolucki, B. & Lemish, D. (2011). Communicating with Children Principles and Practices to Nurture, Inspire, Excite, Educate and Heal. UNICEF. From http://www.unicef.org/ cbsc/files/ CwC_ Web.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2017.
Parsons, S.A., Hutchison, A.C., Hall, L.A., Parsons, A.W., Ives, S.T. & Leggett, A.B. (2019). U.S. teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 82(1), 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.006
Pekmenz, E., Johnson, P. & Gott, R. (2005). Teachers’ understanding of the nature and purpose of practical work. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500068401
Petrus, R. M. (2018). A comparison of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the factors contributing to poor performance in physical sciences: A case of South Africa. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(4), 93-103. doi: 10.12973/tused.10248a
Ping, I. L. L., & Osman, K. (2019). Laboratory-Modified Argument Driven Inquiry (LAB-MADI) module: Content validity process. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 129-140. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/index.php/jpii
Ramnarain, U., & Fortus, D. (2013). South African physical sciences teachers’ perceptions of new content in a revised curriculum. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-15. http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za
Ramnarain, U., (2014). Teachers' perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and teacher education, 38, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.003
Ramnarain, U., & Hlatswayo, M. (2018). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38(1).1-10. DOI: 10.15700/saje.v38n1a1431
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground–A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
Salkind, N.J. (2003). Exploring research (5th ed.). Pearson. Prestige Hall.
Sani, S.S. (2014). Teachers’ purposes and practices in implementing practical work at the lower secondary school level. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 116, 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.338
Science Community Representing Education (SCORE) (2008). Practical work in science: a report and proposal for a strategic framework. Retrieved 1 March 2015, from http://www.score education. org/media/3668/report. pdf.
Sharpe, R., & Abrahams, I. (2020). Secondary school students’ attitudes to practical work in biology, chemistry and physics in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1597696
Stoffels, N.T. (2005). There is a worksheet to be followed": A case study of a science teacher's use of learning support texts for practical work. African Journal of Research in SMT Education, 9(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2005.10740585
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage.
Swain, J., Monk, M., & Johnson, S. (1999). A comparative study of attitudes to the aims of practical work in science education in Egypt, Korea and the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (12), 1311-1324 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290093
Tafa, B. (2012). Laboratory activities and students practical performance: the case of practical organic chemistry. African Journal of Chemical Education, 2(3), 47-76.
Thobela, N.Q.M., & Mtapuri, O. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of the integrated quality management system: lessons from Mpumalanga, South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-14. http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za
Toplis, R., & Allen, M. (2012). ‘I do and I understand?’ Practical work and laboratory use in United Kingdom schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8 (1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.812a
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell, Victoria: Acer Press.
Utete, C. N., & Ilukena, A. M. (2019). The importance of practical work in the teaching and learning of integrated natural sciences and health education at the University of Namibia, Rundu Campus. The Namibia CPD Journal for Educators, 5, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.32642/ncpdje.v5i0.1253
Ward, H., Roden, J., Hewlett, C., & Foreman, J. (2005). Teaching science in primary classroom. A practical guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Waller, V., Farquharson, K., & Dempsey, D. (2016). Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital world. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Watt, James H., Van den Berg, S. A. (1995) Research Methods for Communication Science. Massachusetts: A and Bacon A Simon & Schuster Company.
Watts, A. (2013). The assessment of practical science: a literature review. Cambridge Assessment.
Wei, B., & Li, X. (2017). Exploring science teachers’ perceptions of experimentation: implications for restructuring school practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1775-1794.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1351650
Whyley, D. (2018). Barriers to mobile learning advancements in the United Kingdom. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 807-816). Cham: Springer.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.