Ninth graders’ spatial ability and working memory capacity (WMC) in relation to their science and mathematics achievement and their gender
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/Keywords:
Spatial Ability, Water Level Task (WLT), Working Memory Capacity (WMC), Science and Mathematics Achievement, Gender DifferencesAbstract
The purpose of the current study is to compare high and low achievers in science and mathematics in terms of their spatial ability and Working Memory Capacity (WMC), and to compare male and female learners’ performance in both these two cognitive abilities and their science and mathematics achievements. The sample consisted of 102 ninth graders in Oman. To estimate participants’ spatial ability and their WMC, the Water Level Task (WLT) and the Digit Span Backwards Test (DSBT) were used. The results indicated that both science and mathematics high achievers significantly outperformed low achievers in terms of spatial ability and WMC. In addition, females out-performed males in WMC, while males outperformed females in spatial ability. There were no significant differences between the two genders in terms of their achievement in science and mathematics.
Downloads
References
Ackermann, E. K.(1991). From de-contextualized to situated knowledge: Revisiting Piaget’s water-level experiment. In I. Harel, & S. Papert (Eds). Constructionism (pp. 367-379). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Alamolhodaei, H. (2009). A working memory model applied to mathematical word problem solving. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 183-192.
Al-Balushi, S. M. (2009). Factors Influencing Pre-Service Science Teachers' Imagination at the Microscopic Level in Chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(6), 1089-1110.
Al-Balushi, S. M. (2011). Students' evaluation of the credibility of scientific models that represent natural entities and phenomena. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 571-601. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-010-9209-4.
Alloway, T. P.; Gathercole, S. E. & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Society for Research in Child Development, 77(6), 1698–1716.
Al Orime, S., & Ambusaidi, A. (2011). The impact of using the integration approach between science and math on acquiring the skills for solving scientific problems for fourth grade students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 9-22.
American Association for the Advancement of Sciences (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Sciences (AAAS) (1990). Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Mathematics anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181-185.
Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, mathematics performance, and mathematics anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243-248.
Baddeley, A. (2006). Working memory: An overview. In S. Pickering (Ed.), Working Memory and Education (pp. 1-13), New York: Academic Press.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2011). Quantifying the gender gap in science interests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 523-550.
Bätz, K., Wittler, S., & Wilde, M. (2010). Differences between boys and girls in extracurricular learning settings. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(1), 51-64.
Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (n.d.). Female Teachers’ Mathematics Anxiety Impacts Girls’ Mathematics Achievement [Electronic Version].
Retrieved May 3, 2010 from http://lucian.uchicago.edu/workshops.
Bintaş, J. (2008). Motivational qualities of mathematical experiences for Turkish preservice kindergarten teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(2), 46-52.
Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geosciences Education, 53(4), 402-414.
Blasko, D. G.; Holliday-Darr, K.; Mace, D.& Blasko-Drabik, H. (2004). VIZ: The visualization assessment and training web site. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (2), 256-260.
BouJaoude, S., Salloum, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Relationships between selective cognitive variables and students’ ability to solve chemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 63-84.
Bühner, M., Kröner, S., & Ziegler, M. (2008). Working memory, visual–spatial-intelligence and their relationship to problem-solving. Intelligence, 36, 672-680.
Carter, C. S.; Larussa, M. A. & Bodner, G. M. (1987). A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 645-657.
Clement, J. (2008). Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Clements, D. H. (1998). Geometric and spatial thinking in young children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 436232).
Cramer, K. (2003). Using translation model for curriculum development and classroom instruction. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching (pp. 449-463). Mahwah, NJ, USA Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Diezmann, C. M. & Watters, J. J.(2000). Identifying and supporting spatial intelligence in young children. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(3), 299-313.
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Knight, C., & Stegmann, Z. (2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–16.
Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice (pp. 3-33). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational Leadership, 62(3), 21-26.
Halpern, D. F. (1986). Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Hilsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and Mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1-51.
Hirvasoja, M. (2004). Improving Spatial Skills through Computer Game. Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Jyvaskyla: Jyvaskyla.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The Gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60 (6), 581-592.
Jacobs, J. E., & Simpkins, S. D. (2005). Mapping leaks in the mathematics, science, and technology pipeline. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 3-6.
Johnstone, A. H. (2006). Chemical education research in Glasgow in perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49-63.
Johnstone, A. & El-Banna, H. (1986). Capacities, demands and processes- a predictive model for science education. Education in Chemistry, 23(3), 80-83.
Johnstone, A. & El-Banna, H. (1989). Capacities, Understanding learning difficulties- A predictive research. Studies in Higher Education, 14(2), 159-168.
Johnstone, A.; Hogg, W. & Ziane, M. (1993). A working memory model applied to physics problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 663-672.
Karimi, A., & Venkatesan, S. (2009). Mathematics anxiety, Mathematics performance and academic hardiness in high school students. International Journal of Educational Science 1(1), 33-37.
Koch, J. (1999). Science Stories: Teachers and Children as Science Learners. Bosten, USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31, 549-579.
Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211-223.
Lesh, R., Lester, F. K., & Hjalmarson, M. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on metacognitive functioning in everyday situations where problems solvers develop mathematical constructs. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching (pp. 383-403). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Li, C. (2000). Instruction effect and developmental levels: A study on water-level task with Chinese children ages 9-17. Contemporary Education Psychology, 25,488-498.
Li, C. (2001). Why Do Chinese Students Perform Well on Spatial Tasks? Chinese Teachers’ Perspective. (ERIC Document reproduction Service NO. ED 459414).
Li, C., Nuttall, R., & Zhao, S. (1996). Gender differences among Chinese undergraduate students in the performance of the water-level task. Paper presented at the Asian American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.
Li, C., Nuttall, R., & Zhao, S. (1999). A test of the Piagetian Water-level Task with Chinese students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160, 369-380.
Linn, M.C. & Petersen, A.C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: implications for Mathematics and science achievement. In J.S. Hyde & M.C. Linn, (Eds), The Psychology of Gender: Advances Through Meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Linver, M. R., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The slippery slope: What predicts mathematics grades in middle and high school? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 110, 49-64.
Lohman, D. F.( 1993). Spatial Ability and G. Paper presented at the first Spearman Seminar, University of Plymouth. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/pdf/Spatial_Ability_and_G.pdf
Lord, T. R. (1990). Enhancing learning in the life sciences through spatial perception. Innovative Higher Education, 15(1), 5-16.
Lord, T., & Nicely, G. (1997). Does spatial aptitude Influence science-mathematics Subject preferences of Children? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(2), 67-81. Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33-54.
Mcleay, H. (2006). Imagery, Spatial ability and Problem Solving. Retrieved March, 5, 2008, from http://wiki.mathematics.yorku.ca/images/7/7a/McLeay_Imagery.pdf
Mintzes, J. J., & Wandersee, J. H. (1998). Reform an innovation in science teaching: A human constructivist view. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. San Diego, USA: Academic Press. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1997). Women in Mathematics and Science [Electronic Version]. Retrieved March, 21, 2010, from http://www.ed.gov/NCES National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Science Foundation (NSF) (1999). Preparing Our Children: Science and mathematics Education in the National Interest [Electronic Version]. Retrieved March, 21, 2010,
from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1999/nsb9931/nsb9931.pdf.
Niaz, M., & Robinson, W. R. (1991). Teaching algorithmic problem solving or conceptual understanding: Role of developmental level, mental capacity, and cognitive style. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI, USA, April 7-10.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Panaoura, A., & Panaoura, G. (2006). Cognitive and metacognitive performance on Mathematics. Paper presented at the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague.
Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Şen, A. (2011). Evaluation of beliefs and attitudes of high school students towards science and mathematics courses. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(1), 42-60.
Pascual-Leone, J. & S. Morra. (1991). Horizontality of water level: A neo-Piagetian developmental review. In II. Reese (ed). Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 23, pp 231-276). New York: Academic Press.
Pettitt, L. M. (2004). Gender intensification of peer socialization during puberty. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 106, 23-34.
Pickering, S. (2006). Assessment of working memory in children. In S. Pickering (Ed.),
Working Memory and Education (pp. 241-271). New York: Academic Press.
Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2009). Unraveling bias from student evaluations of their high school science teachers. Science Education, 93, 827-845.
Pozzer, L. & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Making sense of photographs. Science Education, 89, 219-
Pribyl, J. R. & Bodner, G. M.(1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 229-240.
Pulos, S. (1997). Explicit knowledge of gravity and the water-level task. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(3), 233-247.
Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (n.d.). Spatial Ability, Spatial Anxiety, and Working Memory in Early Elementary School [Electronic Version]. Retrieved May, 5, 2010, from http://spatiallearning.org/archives.
Roberts, J. E., & Bell, M. A. (2002). The effects of age and sex on mental rotation performance, verbal performance, and brain electrical activity. Developmental Psychobiology, 40, 391-407.
Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive
ability. Intelligence, 35, 83-92.
Rudmann, D. S. (2002). Solving astronomy problems can be limited by intuited knowledge, spatial ability, or both. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA April 1-5.
Sanchez, C. A. & Wiley, J.(2006). Spatial Ability and Learning Complex Scientific Topics
[Electronic Version]. Retrieved August, 27, 2008 from
http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/csjarchive/proceedings/2007/docs/p1849.pdf
Seng, A. S., & Tan, L. C. (2002). Cultural and gender differences in spatial ability of young children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Childhood Education, San Diego, CA, USA, April 3-6.
Solaz-Portoles, J. J., & Lopez, V. S. (2007). Representations in problem solving in science: Directions for practice. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 1-17.
Stieff, M., Bateman, R., & Uttal, D. (2005). Teaching and learning with three-dimensional representations. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education (pp. 93-120). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
St Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Botton, C. (2009). Working memory and science education: exploring the compatibility of theoretical approaches. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(2), 139-150.
Thomas, H., & Turner, G. (1991). Individual differences and development on waterlevel task performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 171-194.
Vasa, R. & L. Liben. (1996). The water-level task: An intriguing puzzle. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 5, 171-177.
Vecchi, T. (2001). Visuo-spatial processing in congenitally blind people: Is there a genderrelated preference? Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1361-1370.
Velez, M. C.; Silver, D. & Tremaine M. (2005). Understanding Visualization through Spatial
Ability Differences [Electronic Version]. Retrieved April 2008 from
www.caip.rutgers.edu/~mariacv/publications/vis05.pdf.
Watt, H. M. G. (2005). Explaining gendered mathematics enrollments for NSW Australian secondary school students. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 110, 15-29.
Wu, H., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science
Education, 88, 465-492.
Yuan, K.; Steedle, J.; Shavelson, R.; Alonzo, A. & Oppezzo, M.(2006). Working memory, fluid intelligence and science learning. Educational Research Review, 1, 83-98.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Published
How to Cite
