Pre-service physics teachers’ conceptual understanding of kinematics graphs in Tanzania

Beni Mbwile; Paskali Jonathan Hegwa

doi:10.36681/tused.2025.018

Authors

Beni Mbwile University of Dar es Salaam
Paskali Jonathan Hegwa Tanzania Institute of Education (TIE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.018

Keywords:

Graphs, kinematics, pre-service teachers, training colleges

Abstract

Tanzanian secondary school students have consistently performed poorly in the topic of motion in a straight line, which involves kinematics formulas and graphs. Despite instruction, many struggle to plot and interpret these graphs, largely due to limited conceptual understanding among both learners and teachers. This study examines the conceptual understanding of kinematics graphs among pre-service physics teachers in selected Tanzanian teacher training colleges. Using a mixed-methods approach with a sequential explanatory design, the study involved 225 pre-service teachers from two colleges. Data were collected through a validated kinematics graph concept inventory and interviews, then analyzed using SPSS version 22, Excel, and thematic analysis technique. The findings revealed five key challenges: difficulty interpreting slopes of graphs that do not start at the origin, representing stationary objects on the graph, calculating total distance when motion involves both forward and backward directions, interpreting areas under acceleration-time graphs, and converting between kinematics graphs. These challenges underline the need for learner-centred teaching strategies to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and performance. The study recommends that physics educators in Tanzania recognize and address these specific difficulties when teaching kinematics graphs to students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alimisis, D., & Boulougaris, G. (2014, July). Robotics in physics education: Fostering graphing abilities in kinematics. In Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, (pp. 2-10). https://rb.gy/s1hf2

Amin, B. D., Sahib, E. P., Harianto, Y. I., Patandean, A. J., Herman, H., & Sujiono, E. (2020). The interpreting ability on science kinematics graphs of senior high school students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23349

Antwi, V. (2015). Impact of the use of MBL, simulation and graph samples in improving Ghanaian SHS science students understanding in describing kinematics graphs. Advance in Life Science and Technology, 31(1), 24-33. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/ALST/article/view/21272

Antwi, V., Savelsbergh, E., & Eijkelhof, H. (2018, September). Understanding kinematics graphs using MBL tools, simulations and graph samples in an interactive engagement context in a Ghanaian university. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1076, pp. 1-9. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1076/1/012002

Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449

Bowen, P., Rose, R., & Pilkington, A. (2017). Mixed methods-theory and practice: Sequential, explanatory approach. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 10-27. https://bit.ly/3FX9aaI

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage. https://toc.library.ethz.ch/objects/pdf/z01_978-1-4129-7517-9_01.pdf

Hernández, C. A., Núñez, R. P., & Gamboa, A. A. (2021, October). Gains in active learning of physics: a measurement applying the test of understanding graphs of kinematics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. (Vol. 2073, No. 1, p. 012003). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2073/1/012003/meta

Kirya, K. R., Mashood, K. K., & Yadav, L. L. (2022). Development of a circular motion concept inventory for use in Ugandan science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1312-1327. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.176

Manurung, S. R., Mihardi, S., Rustaman, N. Y., & Siregar, N. (2018). Improvement of graph interpretation ability using hypertext-assisted kinematic learning and formal thinking ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 14(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v14i1.9444

Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2016). Performance of Graduate Students at Identifying Introductory Physics Students' Difficulties Related to Kinematics Graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.04354. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.04354

Mbwile, B., & Ntivuguruzwa, C. (2023a). Impact of practical work in promoting learning of kinematics graphs in Tanzanian teachers’ training colleges. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(3), 320-338. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i3.3343

Mbwile, B., & Ntivuguruzwa, C. (2023b, March). Impact of YouTube Videos in Promoting Learning of Kinematics Graphs in Tanzanian Teachers’ Training Colleges. International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Education Applications (pp. pp. 1099-1109). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36118-0_93

Mbwile, B., Ntivuguruzwa, C., & Mashood, K. K. (2023a). Development and validation of a concept inventory for interpreting kinematics graphs in the Tanzanian context. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 673-693. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.673

Mbwile, B., Ntivuguruzwa, C., & Mashood, K. K. (2023b). Exploring the understanding of concept inventories for classroom assessment by physics tutors and pre-service teachers in Tanzania. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 27(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2023.2183607

McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & Van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15104

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2019). Basic education statistics in Tanzania. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. https://www.tamisemi.go.tz/singleministers/regional-best-2019

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2020). Basic education statistics in Tanzania. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. https://www.tamisemi.go.tz/singleministers/regional-best-2020

Mohammad, S., Khoshman, J. M., & Tayeh, K. A. (2020). Jordanian pre-service physics teacher's misconceptions about force and motion. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 528-543. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.43

Mubarokah, F. D., Mulyani, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Identifying students’ misconceptions of acid-base concepts using a three-tier diagnostic test: A case of Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special), 51-58. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/688

National Examination Council of Tanzania. (2017). Students’ response item analysis report for form two national assessment: Physics. National Examination Council of Tanzania. https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/cira/ftna/2017/031_PHYSICS.pdf

National Examination Council of Tanzania. (2018). Students’ response item analysis report for form two national assessment. Physics. National Examination Council of Tanzania. https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/cira/ftna/2018/031_PHYSICS.pdf

National Examination Council of Tanzania. (2019). Students’ response item analysis report for form two national assessment: Physics. National Examination Council of Tanzania. https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/cira/ftna/2019/031_PHYSICS.pdf

National Examination Council of Tanzania. (2020). Students’ response item analysis report for form two national assessment: Physics. National Examination Council of Tanzania. https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/cira/ftna/2020/031_PHYSICS.pdf

National Examination Council of Tanzania. (2021). Students’ response item analysis report for form two national assessment: Physics. National Examination Council of Tanzania. https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/cira/ftna/2021/031_PHYSICS.pdf

Núñez, R. P., Suárez, A. G., & Castro, W. A. (2022). Interpreting the slope of a straight line in kinematics graphs with school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. (Vol. 2163, No. 1, p. 012011). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2163/1/012011/meta

Ole, F. C., & Gallos, M. R. (2023). Impact of formative assessment based on feedback loop model on high school students’ conceptual understanding and engagement with physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.019

Phage, I. B., Lemmer, M., & Hitge, M. (2017). Probing factors influencing students’ graph comprehension regarding four operations in kinematics graphs. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1333751

Planinic, L,, Lvanjek, L., & Susac, A. (2013). Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts Maja. Physics Education Research, 9, 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020103

Setyono, A., Nugroho, S. E., & Yulianti, I. (2016). Analysis of students' difficulty in solving physics problems in the form of graphs. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(3), 32-39. doi:10.15294/upej.v5i3.13729

Susac, A., Bubic, A., Kazotti, E., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2018). Student understanding of graph slope and area under a graph: A comparison of physics and nonphysics students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020109

Zavala, G., Tejeda, S., Barniol, P., & Beichner, R. J. (2017). Modifying the test of understanding graphs in kinematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020111