Promoting conceptual change in science which is more effective: conceptual change text or analogy?

Authors

  • Serkan Sevim Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Denizli-TURKEY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/

Keywords:

Conceptual Change, Conceptual Change Text, Analogy

Abstract

This research is planned to examine the efficiency of conceptual change text and analogy consisting of science students’ alternative concepts within basic concepts of Chemical Bonds. The sample of this study is composed of the selected 46 students who attend science classes at Çukurca Mehmetcik Private Courses. The students were graduated from high school and were continuing their education in the institute to prepare for the university exams. The quasi-experimental research design was used in this study. Two classes were randomly selected as experimental groups from four classes. In the study, data was collected by using “Chemical Bonds Concept Achievement Test” (CBCAT). The CBCAT was used as the pre-test to detect students’ levels at the beginning of the study, and the post-test to find out the students’ new levels of achievement. In the analysis of the data, an independent sample test design was performed, in which dependent variables were the pre-test and post-test scores.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson. C. W. & Smith. E. L., (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler Ed..

Educator's handbook: A research prospective pp.84-111. New York: Lonmnan.

Bayır, G., (2000). Effect of conceptual change text instruction on students' understanding of

chemical change and conservation of mass concepts. Master Thesis, META Institute of

Science, Ankara.

Bilgin, İ. & Geban, Ö. (2001). Benzeşim anoloji yöntemi kullanarak lise 2. Sınıf

öğrencilerinin kimyasal denge konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesi, Yeni

Binyılın Başında Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi Sempoyumu, Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul

Bishop, B. A. & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and it’s

role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.

Boo, H. K. (1998). Students’ Understanding of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical

reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 569-581.

Brown, D.E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics:

Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29,

–34.

Caramazza. A., McCloskey. J., & Green. B. (1981). Naive beliefs in sophisticated subjects:

Misconceptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9, 111-123.

Chambers, S. K. & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in

electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current,

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123.

Cho. H., Kahle. J. B., & Nordland, F. H. (1985). An investigation of high school textbooks as

source of misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions for teaching

genetics. Science Education, 69, 707-719.

Clement. J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory physics. American Journal of

Physics, 50, 66-71.

Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’

preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241–1257.

Coll, R. K. & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners’ use of analogy and alternative conceptions for

chemical bonding: A cross-age study, Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 48(1), 24-

Diakidoy, I. A. N., Kendeou, P. & Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: the effects of

text structure in science learning and conceptual change, Contemporary Educational

Psychology, 28, 335-356.

Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept

development in adolescent science students, Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.

Driver, R., & Erickson, G., 1983. Theories in action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in

the study of students, conceptual frameworks in science, Studies in Science Education,

, 37-60.

Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science

Education,75, 649–672.

Eshach, H. & Garik, P., 2001. Students’ conceptions about atoms and atom-bonding.

Available online at: www.bu.edu/smec/qsad/ed/QM_NARST_finalpg.pdf accessed 20

December, 2005.

Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony

(Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge: Cambridge

Press.

Gilbert, J.K., Osborne, J.R. & Fensham, P.J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences

for Teaching, Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.

Glynn, S., Duit, R. & Thiele, R. (1995). Teaching with analogies: A strategy for constructing

knowledge. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research

reforming practice (pp. 247–273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Griffiths, Alan K. & Preston, K. P. (1992). Grade-12 Students’ misconceptions relating to

fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Research in Science Teaching,

(6), 611-628.

Griffiths. A. K. & Grant. B. A. C. (1985). High school students’ understanding of food webs:

Identification of a learning hierarchy and related misconceptions. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 22, 421-436

Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E. & Glass, G. V. (1992). Promoting conceptual change in science:

can text be used effectively?, Journal of Reading, 35(8), 642-649.

Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.E., Glass, G.V. & Gamas, W.W. (1993). Promoting conceptual

change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of interventions from reading education

and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 116–159.

Guzzetti, B. J., Williams, W. O., Skeels, S. A. & Wu, S. M. (1997). Influence of text struture

on learning counterintuitive physics concepts, Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

(7), 701–719.

Helm, H. & Novak, J.D., Eds., (1983). Proceedings of the international seminar on

misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Hesse, M.B. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre

Dame Press.

Hırça, N., Çalık, M. & Seven, S. (2011). 5E modeline göre geliştirilen materyallerin

öğrencilerin kavramsal değişimine ve fizik dersine karşı tutumlarına etkisi: “İş, Güç ve

Enerji” ünitesi örneği. Journal of Turkish Science education. 8(1), 139-150.

Hynd, C.R., Alvermann, D. & Qian, G. (1997). Pre-service elementary school teachers’

conceptual change about projectile motion: refutation text, demonstration, affective

factors, and relevance, Science Education, 81, 1–27.

Hynd, C.R., McWhorter, J.Y., Phares, V. L. & Suttles, C.W. (1994). The role of instructional

variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 31(9), 933-946.

Iding, M.K. (1997). How analogies foster learning from science texts. Instructional Science,

, 233–253.

Janiuk, R.M. (1993). The process of learning chemistry, a review of the studies. Journal of

Chemical Education. 70(10), 828-829.

Kılıç, D., (2007). The effect of the teaching with analogies on elimination of misconceptions

of 9th grade students about Chemical Bonding. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi,

Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Lawson, A.E. (1993). The importance of analogy: A prelude to the special issue. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1213–1214.

Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2001). Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis

through text design. Learning and Instruction, 11, 241-257.

Nicoll, G.A. (2001). Report of undergraduates’ bonding misconception, International Journal

of Science Education, 237, 707-730.

Ocak, S. Y. (2000). Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on overcoming students’

misconceptions of mechanical energy at 10th grade level, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ

Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F. & Garnett, P. J. (1989). Development and application of a

diagnostic instrument to evaluate Grade-11 and -12 students’ concepts of covalent

bonding and structure following a course of instruction, Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 26(4), 301-314.

Peterson, R.F., & Tregust, D.F. (1989). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions of covalent

bonding and structure, Journal of Chemical Education, 66(6), 459-460

Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of

scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change, Science Education, 66,

-227.

Schmidt, H.J. (1997). Students’ misconceptions-looking for a pattern. Science Education., 81,

-135.

Sevim, S. (2007). Preparation and application of conceptual change texts on solution and

chemical bonding concepts. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical

University, Turkey.

Taber, Keith S. (1997). Student understanding of ionic bonding: molecular versus electrostatic

framework? School Science Review, 78(285), 85-95.

Taber, Keith S. (2011). Models, molecules and misconceptions: A commentary on “secondary

school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding”. Journal of Turkish Science

education. 8(1), 3-18.

Tan, K.C.D., & Treagust, D.F. (1999). Evaluating students’ understanding of chemical

bonding. School Science Review, 81(294), 75-84.

Thagard, P. (1992). Analogy, explanation, and education. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 29, 537–544.

Thiele, R.B., & Treagust, D.F. (1995). Analogies in chemistry textbooks. International

Journal of Science Education, 17, 783–795.

Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’

misconception in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.

Ünal, S. (2003). Lise 1 ve Lise 3 öğrencilerinin kimyasal bağlar konusundaki kavramları

anlama seviyelerinin karşılaştırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, KTÜ Fen Bilimleri

Enstitüsü, Trabzon.

Ünlü S. (2000). The Effects of conceptual change texts in students' achievement of atom.

molecüle. matter concept, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Venville, G.J. & Treagust, D.F. (1997). Analogies in biology education: A contentious issue.

The American Biology Teacher, 59, 282–287.

Wang, T. & Andre, T., (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text application

questions versus no questions in learning about electricity, Contemporary Educational

Psychology, 16, 103-116.

Yürük, N., (2000). Effectiveness of conceptual change texts oriented instruction on

understanding of electrochemical cell concepts, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ Fen

Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

15.09.2013

How to Cite

Promoting conceptual change in science which is more effective: conceptual change text or analogy?. (2013). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(3), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 117

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.