STEAM-5E: A new methodological approach to STEAM based on a critical literature review
Keywords:
STEAM, STEM, 5E, methodology, reviewAbstract
Educational institutions and organisations around the world recognise the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) and STEAM (A for Arts) paradigms as appropriate frameworks for achieving the key competences needed for the 21st century. However, there are ongoing debates within them and different methodologies to address these debates. First, this work aims to analyse these debates and the diversity of methodologies proposed through a narrative review of the literature following a qualitative content analysis methodology. Secondly, a new framework, STEAM-5E, is proposed to address this complexity. Its basic pillars are the 5E methodology, the integration of STEAM disciplines broadly, the development of creativity across its multiple facets, special consideration for equity, and the search for learner motivation through inquiry, manipulative activities, and collaborative work. Metacognitive and dialogic processes mediate all learning. Collaboration between researchers and teachers is particularly relevant, according to the basic principles of Design-Based Research, to develop classroom materials adapted to their real context. Several tools are included for implementation evaluation and assessment. Finally, a STEAM-5E project designed for upper primary education (9-11 years old) is presented, along with evidence of its validity and effectiveness. This model could serve as a guide for teachers and researchers in creating and evaluating new STEAM projects.
Downloads
References
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Aguilera, D., Lupiáñez, J. L., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, J. M. (2024). IDEARR model for STEM Education—A framework Proposal. Education Sciences, 14(6), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060638
Akerson, V. L., Burgess, A., Gerber, A., Guo, M., Khan, T. A. & Newman, S. (2018). Disentangling the meaning of STEM: Implications for science education and science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1435063
Allina, B. (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119 (2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1296392
Archer, L., Moote, J., MacLeod, E., Francis, B. & DeWitt, J. (2020). ASPIRES 2: Young people's science and career aspirations, age 10–19. UCL Institute of Education. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10092041
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., Magana, A., Kaloustian, G., & Zhu, J. (2015). The landscape of PreK-12 engineering online resources for teachers: global trends. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0015-3
Baldinger, E.E., Staats, S., Covington Clarkson, L.M., Gullickson, E.C., Norman, F., Akoto, B. (2020). A Review of Conceptions of Secondary Mathematics in Integrated STEM Education: Returning Voice to the Silent M. In: Anderson, J., Li, Y. (eds) Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. Advances in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_5
Barak, M. (2013). Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solving taxonomies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. 11 (3), 316-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2012-0020
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2011). Quantifying the gender gap in science interests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9194-7
Bautista, A. (2021). STEAM education: Contributing evidence of validity and effectiveness. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4) 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1926678
Belbase, S., Mainali, B.R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2021). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-37 https://doi.org/1.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art education, 65(2), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389-391. https://doi.org/10.1126 / science.aah6524
Bruijnzeel, A., Yazilitas, D., Smeets, I., De Bruyckere, P. and Cramer, J. (2022). How diverse is diversity? An exploration of references to diversity in the recent literature in STEM higher education. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12667
Burke, B. N. (2014). 6E Learning byDeSIGN™ model: Maximizing informed design and inquiry in the integrative STEM classroom. The Technology and Engineering Teacher, 68(4), 14–19.
Bush, S. B., Cook, K. L., Ronau, R. N, Rakes, C. R. Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Saderholm, J. (2016). A highly structured collaborative STEAM program: Enacting a professional development framework. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 2(2), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2016.25
Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L.B. Flick & N.G. Lederman (Eds.) Scientific inquiry and nature of science (Vol. 25, pp. 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_1
Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 8-12. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/using-bscs-5e-instructional-model-introduce-stem/docview/2175248957/se-2?accountid=14475.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. BSCS. https://bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model/
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (Eds.). (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Springer.
Castek, J., Schira Hagerman, M., & Woodard, R. (Eds). (2019). Principles for Equity-centered design of STEAM learning-through-making. University of Arizona. https://circlcenter.org/events/synthesis-design-workshops
Cavanagh, S., & Trotter, A. (2008). Where’s the “T” in STEM. Education Week, 27(30), 17-19.
Chapell, K., Hetherington, L., Keene, H. R., Wren, H., Alexopoulos, A., Ben-Horin, O., Nikolopoulos, K., Robberstad, J., Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). Dialogue and materiality/ embodiment in science-arts creative pedagogy: Their role and manifestation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.008
Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., & Wang, X. (2023). Fostering computational thinking through unplugged activities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7
Chin, D. B., Blair, K. P., Wolf, R. C., Conlin, L. D., Cutumisu, M., Pfaffman, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2019). Educating and measuring choice: A test of the transfer of design thinking in problem solving and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(3), 337-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1570933
Colucci-Gray, L., Trowsdale, J., Cooke, C. F., Davies, R., Burnard, P., & Gray, D. S. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: How can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/promoting-educational-research/projects/reviewing-the-potential-and-challenges-of-developing-steam-education
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the code? How creativity & motivation interacts with inquiry-based learning. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641678
Conradty, C., Sotiriou, S. A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). How Creativity in STEAM Modules Intervenes with Self-Efficacy and Motivation. Education Sciences, 10(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030070
Costantino, T. (2018). STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973
Craft, A. (2001). Little c creativity. In A. Craft. B. Jeffrey. & M. Liebling (Eds.). Creativity in education (pp. 45-61). Continuum.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
Cruz Ramírez, M., & Martínez Cepena, M. C. (2012). Perfeccionamiento de un instrumento para la selección de expertos en las investigaciones educativas. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 14(2), 167-179. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15525013012
De la Garza, A., & Travis, C. (Eds.). (2019). The STEAM revolution: transdisciplinary approaches to science. technology. engineering. arts. humanities and mathematics. Springer.
Design Based Research Collective (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
ElSayary, A. (2021). Transdisciplinary STEAM curriculum design and authentic assessment in online learning: A model of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains: Research Article. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 493-511. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.86
Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en medición, 6(1), 27-36. https://www.academia.edu/download/48452857/Articulo3_Juicio_de_expertos_27-36.pdf
Forde, E. N., Robinson, L., Ellis, J. A., & Dare, E. A. (2023). Investigating the presence of mathematics and the levels of cognitively demanding mathematical tasks in integrated STEM units. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00070-1
Garcia I Grau, F., Valls, C., Piqué, N., & Ruiz-Martín, H. (2021). The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students’ conceptual learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1918354
Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). Emerging technologies for STEAM education: Full STEAM ahead. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5
Glaveanu, V. P. & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Creative Experience: A Non-Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 75-80 https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606
Glaveanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.006
Graham, M. A. (2021): The disciplinary borderlands of education: art and STEAM, Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4), 769-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1926163
Gui, Y., Cai, Z., Yang, Y., Kong, L., Fan, X., & Tai, R. H. (2023). Effectiveness of digital educational game and game design in STEM learning: a meta-analytic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00424-9
Haddad, F., Tabieh, A., Alsmadi, M., Mansour, O., & Al-Shalabi, E. (2022). Metacognitive awareness of STEAM education among primary stage teachers in Jordan. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1171-1191. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.168
Han, J., Park, D., Hua, M., & Childs, P. (2021). Is group work beneficial for producing creative designs in STEM design education? International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09709-y
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885025
Henriksen, D. (2017). Creating STEAM with design thinking: Beyond STEM and arts integration. The STEAM Journal, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20170301.11
Hernández-Torrano, D. & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
Holzer, M. F. (2005). Teaching and learning at Lincoln Center Institute. Lincoln Center Institute for the Performing Arts.
Hong, O. (2017). STEAM education in Korea: Current policies and future directions. Science and Technology Trends Policy Trajectories and Initiatives in STEM Education, 8(2), 92-102.
Hynes, M. M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., & Hammer, D. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/165
Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M.J., Bush, S.B., Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Yost, C., & Fowler, A. (2021). Equity-Oriented Conceptual Framework for K-12 STEM literacy. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(38) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z
Jolly, A. (2014, 18 de noviembre). STEM vs. STEAM: Do the arts belong. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2014/11/18/ctq-jolly-stem-vs-steam.html.
Jumini, S., Madnasri, S., Cahyono, E., & Parmin, P. (2022). Article review: integration of science, technology, entrepreneurship in learning science through bibliometric analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1237-1253. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.172
Keane, L., & Keane, M. (2016). STEAM by Design. Design and Technology Education, 21(1), 61-82. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1119572.pdf
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Khine, M. S., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). STEAM education: Theory and practice. Springer.
Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Qualitative research in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113
Kokotsaki, D. (2016). Pupils’ attitudes to school and music at the start of secondary school. Educational Studies, 42(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1160822
Lage-Gómez, C., & Ros, G. (2021). Transdisciplinary integration and its implementation in primary education through two STEAM projects (La integración transdisciplinar y su aplicación en Educación Primaria a través de dos proyectos STEAM). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 801-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1925474.
Lage-Gómez, C., & Ros, G. (2023). How transdisciplinary integration, creativity and student motivation interact in three STEAM projects for gifted education?. Gifted Education International, 39(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142942311677
Lage-Gómez, C., & Ros, G. (2024). On the interrelationships between diverse creativities in primary education STEAM projects. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101456
Larkin, K., & Lowrie, T. (2023). Teaching approaches for STEM integration in pre-and primary school: A systematic qualitative literature review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(Suppl 1), 11-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10362-1
Leonard Bernstein Office (n.d.). Artful Learning. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from https://www.leonardbernstein.com/artful-learning
Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(11), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
López Carrillo, M. D., Calonge García, A., & Lebrón Moreno, J. A. (2024). Self-Regulation of Student Learning in a STEAM Project. Education Sciences, 14(6), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060579
Lu, S. Y., Lo, C. C., & Syu, J. Y. (2021). Project-based learning oriented STEAM: the case of micro–bit paper-cutting lamp. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09714-1
Lubart, T., Thornhill-Miller, B.J. (2019). Creativity. An overview of the 7C's of Creative Thought. In R.J. Sternberg & J. Funke (Eds.), The Psychology of Human Thought: An Introduction. Heidelberg University Publishing. https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/reader/download/470/470-69-85822-1-10-20190724.pdf
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Marín-Marín, J. A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: a bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-21. 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x
Martín, H. R. (2020). ¿Cómo aprendemos?: una aproximación científica al aprendizaje y la enseñanza. Graó.
Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
Megías, C. (2018). Guía rápida de pensamiento gráfico para educadores. SantillanaLAB. https://www.santillanalab.com/guia-rapida-pensamiento-grafico-educadores/
Megías, C. (2020). Hacia una revolución gráfica del sistema educativo. Apuntes sobre el papel del pensamiento gráfico en la formación docente. In A. Murillo, J. Tejada, M.E. Riaño, N. Berbel, R. Morant (Coords). Escuelas creadoras, escuelas del cambio. El arte como herramienta de transformación. EdictOrália Llibres i Publicaciones.
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069
National Assessment of Educational Progress (2018). Technology and Engineering Literacy. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/tel/
National Academy of Sciences (2014). STEM integration in K‐12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
National Research Council (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown and R. R. Cocking (Eds). National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2006). America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. S. R. Singer, M. L. Hilton, and H. A. Schweingruber (Eds.).The National Academies Press.
Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2024). Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471
Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I. M., & Arriassecq, I. (2022). A theoretical framework for integrated STEM education. Science & Education, 31(2), 383-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x
Palid, O., Cashdollar, S., Deangelo, S., Chu, C., Bates, M. (2023) Inclusion in practice: a systematic review of diversity-focused STEM programming in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00387-3
Pavlou, V., & Kambouri, M. (2007). Pupils´ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool.. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3-4), 282-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.005
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Portillo-Blanco, A.; Deprez, H.; De Cock, M.; Guisasola, J.; Zuza, K. A. (2024). Systematic Literature Review of Integrated STEM Education: Uncovering Consensus and Diversity in Principles and Characteristics. Educational Sciences, 14(9), 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091028
Psycharis, S., Kalovrektis, K., & Xenakis, A. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Computational Pedagogy in STEAM education: Determinants and perspectives. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v1i1.4
Quigley, C. & Herro, D. (2016). Finding the joy in the unknown: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
Ritz, J. M. & Fan, S. C. (2015). STEM and technology education: international state-of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z
Rohde, M. (2013). The sketchnote handbook: the illustrated guide to visual note taking. Peachpit Press.
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8
Root-Bernstein, R. (2015). Arts and crafts as adjuncts to STEM education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9362-0
Ros, G., García, A. C., Rey, A. F., Varela, A. B. G., Romero, M. N. H., Carrillo, M. D. L., Rodríguez-Laguna, M. T., Rodríguez-Arteche, I., & Mendoza, J. P. (2024). El desafío STEAM a prueba: evaluación de un proyecto para Educación Primaria desde la perspectiva del alumnado. In 31 Encuentros Internacionales de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales: Hacia una educación científica alineada con la Agenda 2030 (pp. 129-134). Servicio de Publicaciones e Imagen Institucional, Universidad de Burgos. https://libros.ubu.es/servpubu-acceso-abierto/catalog/book/68
Ros, G., Rey, A. F., Calonge, A., & López-Carrillo, M. D. (2022). The design of a teaching-learning sequence on simple machines in elementary education and its benefit on creativity and self-regulation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2066. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11487
Ros, G. & Rodríguez-Arteche, I. (2023). Student Perception of Their Development of Creativity in a STEAM Project for Primary Education. In Connecting science education with cultural heritage: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA). European Science Education Research Association ESERA. https://www.esera2023.net/esera-conference-proceedings/
Salden, R. J., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2006). A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.003
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26
Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., & Hill, C. (2013). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviors, attitudes, and clinical practices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidenced-based clinical practice. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 11(2). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp/vol11/iss2/7/
Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2021). When Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Works: Evidence for Productive Failure. Review of Educational Research, 92(5). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019105
Smith, A. (2016). Experiential learning. Encyclopedia of Human Resource Management. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783475469
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018). Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy Research & Social Science, 45, 12-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A. & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Toma, R. B., & García-Carmona, A. (2021). "De STEM nos gusta todo menos STEM": análisis crítico de una tendencia educativa de moda. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 39(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3093
Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
Tsai, H. Y., Chung, C. C., & Lou, S. J. (2017). Construction and development of iSTEM learning model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78019
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Unfried, A., Faber, M., & Wiebe, E. (2014). Gender and student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University, 51, 1-26.
Vázquez, Á. & Manassero, M. A. (2008). El declive de las actitudes hacia la ciencia de los estudiantes: Un indicador inquietante para la Educación científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 5(3), 274-292. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/920/92050303.pdf
Veldman, M.A. & Kostons, D. (2019) Cooperative and collaborative learning: considering four dimensions of learning in groups. Pedagogische Studien, 96, 76-81. https://www.onderwijsdatabank.nl/107886/cooperative-and-collaborative-learning-considering-four-dimensions-of-learning-groups/
Wan, Z. H., English, L., So, W. W. M., & Skilling, K. (2023). STEM integration in primary schools: Theory, implementation and impact. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(Suppl 1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10401-x
Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8
Yoong, W. K., & Hoe, L. N. (2009). Singapore education and mathematics curriculum. In Mathematics education: the Singapore Journey (pp. 13-47). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812833761_0002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Turkish Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements: Credit must be given to the creator; only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted; no derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.
