Design, implementation and assessment of complex engineering problems for the undergraduate engineering programme
Keywords:
Complex engineering problem solving, complex engineering activities, outcome-based education, assessment rubric, accreditationAbstract
In the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, Outcome-Based Education (OBE) has been adopted worldwide to meet the growing demand for engineering graduates with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to solve complex engineering problems. In this work, a methodology is presented for designing, implementing, and assessing students’ performance in a Complex Engineering Problem group project, in accordance with the guidelines of the Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education (BAETE) in Bangladesh. The mapping of course outcomes (COs) to programme outcomes (POs), the knowledge profile, attributes of complex engineering problem-solving, and complex engineering activities is presented. The design and implementation of an effective assessment key to measure students’ performance is presented using a case study in the Microprocessor and Embedded System course in the Electrical and Electronic Engineering programme. This contribution will be very useful to the teaching community in developing the OBE curriculum as well as researchers in the field of engineering and technical education.
Downloads
References
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (2020). Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/A001-21-22-Accreditation-Policy-and-Procedure-Manual.pdf.
Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P., Raths, J. & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. (1st ed.). Longman.
Ayadat, T., Ahmed, D., Chowdhury, S. & Asiz, A. (2020). Measurable performance indicators of student learning outcomes: A case study. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 22(1), 40–50.
Bahsan, R. et al. (2014). Assessment of Complex Engineering Problems in the Thermal Engineering Course. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Engineering Education (ICED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Bangladesh Accreditation Council. (2017). Bangladesh Accreditation Council Act. http://www.bac.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bac.portal.gov.bd/page/5023a431_ac5a_4a61_af81_ab838441ad8e/2021-12-29-06-29-30102ebef6f2a3488bf5fba93efeb8b2.pdf.
Bangladesh Accreditation Council. (2022). Accreditation Rules. http://www.bac.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bac.portal.gov.bd/files/77c5a32f_3abd_4910_a7eb_53d7b2ed7501/2022-11-22-07-14-9e144b0175240a4d4316ad92c9dc539f.pdf.
Baran, M., Baran, M., Karakoyun, F. & Maskan, A. (2021). The Influence of project-based STEM (PjbL-STEM) applications on the development of 21-st century skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 798–815. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.104.
Basir, N., Lian, O.C., Salmizi, J.M. & Shaharin, H. (2019). Assessment of outcome-based integrated design project. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.541.
Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education. (2019). Accreditation Manual for Undergraduate Engineering Programs. https://www.baetebangladesh.org/2nd_edi_05.03.2019_F. pdf.
Chuang, S.-H. N., & Ali, H.E.- (2017). Assessment of the electrical and computer engineering senior design projects at Old Dominion University. Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Zone II Conference, 2-5 March, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Dewi, C. A., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Implementation of case-based learning in science education: a systematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 729-749. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.041.
Easa, S. M. (2013). Framework and guidelines for graduate attribute assessment in engineering education. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40(6), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2012-0485.
Funke, J. & Frensch, P.A. (2007). Complex problem solving: The European perspective - 10 years after. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems. Routledge.
International Engineering Alliance. (2021). Graduate Attributes & Profession Competencies. https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/IEA-Graduate-Attributes-and-Professional-Competencies-2021.1-Sept-2021.pdf
Isa, C. M. M., Chai Lian, O., Liew, C. P., Saman, H. M., Che Ibrahim, C. K. I., & Yusof, Z. (2021). Effective implementation of complex engineering problems and activities in Malaysian engineering curricula. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16219.
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C.B. (2013). Everyday Problem solving in engineering: lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x.
Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613.
Jonassen, D.H. & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-Based Reasoning and instructional design: using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504994.
Hassan, M. M. S. (2012). Challenges of implementing outcome based engineering education in universities in Bangladesh. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 362-364. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECE.2012.6471562.
Kasuga, W., Maro, W., & Pangani, I. (2022). Effect of Problem-based learning on developing science process skills and learning achievement on the topic of safety in our environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 872-886. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.154.
Lanziner, N., & Strong, D. (2017). Designing rubrics to assess engineering design, professional practice, and communication over three years of study. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.6509.
Le, S. K., Hlaing, S. N., & Ya, K. Z. (2022). 21st century competences and learning that Technical and vocational training. Journal of Engineering Researcher and Lecturer, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.58712/jerel.v1i1.4.
Liew, C.P., Hamzah, S.H., Puteh, M., Mohammad, S., Badaruzzaman, W.H.W. (2020). A Systematic approach to implementing complex problem solving in engineering curriculum. In M. E. Auer, H. Hortsch, & P. Sethakul (Eds.), The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education: 22nd International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2019) - Volume 1 (pp. 880-891). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_86.
Ling, J. H. (2024). Implementation of complex engineering problem solving projects in a Malaysian engineering programme. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Science, 3(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.56916/ijess.v3i2.722.
Mohammad, A.W. & Zaharim, A. (2012). Programme Outcomes assessment models in engineering faculties. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p115.
Pejcinovic, B. (2020). Design of rubrics for student outcomes in 2019-2020 ABET Criteria. 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), 1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245228.
Premalatha, K. (2019). Course and program outcomes assessment methods in outcome-based education: a review. Journal of Education, 199(3), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419854351.
Rajak, A., Shrivastava, A.K., & Shrivastava, D.P. (2018). Automating outcome based education for the attainment of course and program outcomes. Proceedings of 2018 Fifth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTIT.2018.8649532.
Syeed, M. M., Shihavuddin, A., Uddin, M. F., Hasan, M., & Khan, R. H. (2022). Outcome based education (OBE): Defining the process and practice for engineering education. IEEE Access, 10, 119170-119192. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3219477.
University Grants Commission of Bangladesh. (2020). Template of outcome based education (OBE) Curriculum.https://ugc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/ugc.portal.gov.bd/notices/e4c1bdfd_8db9_4af8_a538_34dbc84ed2b0/OBE131019.pdf.
Uzel, L., & Bilici, S. C. (2022). Engineering design-based activities: Investigation of middle school students' problem-solving and design skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.116.
Ülger, B. B., & Çepni, S. (2020). Gifted education and STEM: A thematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.36681/
Wahab, H. F. A., Ayob, A., Zaki, W. M. D. W., Hussain, H., Hussain, A., & Mokri, S. S. (2011). Program outcomes measurement and assessment processes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2011.05.008.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global competitiveness report special edition 2020: How countries are performing on the road to recovery. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2020.pdf.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the future: Defining New models of education for the fourth industrial revolution. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Schools_of_the_Future_Report_2019.pdf.
World Economic Forum. (2023). Defining education 4.0: a taxonomy for the future of learning. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Defining_Education_4.0_2023.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Turkish Science Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements: Credit must be given to the creator; only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted; no derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.

