Health issues within the socioscientific context: Systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.012Keywords:
Socioscientific, health issues, argumentation , problem based-learning, genetic modificationAbstract
Health issues present significant and complex challenges to society. This study aimed to investigate research trends related to health issues as socioscientific issues (SSI). The SSI articles analysed were from three prominent data sources: Scopus, Google Scholar, and Pubmed. Articles were retrieved via Harzing's Publish or Perish application based on published between 2018 to 2023 and the keyword "Socioscientific Issue". There were 415 articles obtained and screened using the Prisma technique, leaving 81 eligible articles. The articles underwent qualitative content analysis and quantitative bibliometric analysis using the VOSviewer software to determine research topics, research objectives, and the learning model implemented. According to the research findings, qualitative analysis showed the dominant topics were genetic modification (28.3%), COVID-19 (17.2%), and food additives (6.7%). The primary objectives were to develop argumentation skills (16.2%), conceptual understanding (13.7%), and decision-making (11.1%). The frequently implemented learning models were problem-based (28.4%), case-based (24.7%), and inquiry-based learning (16.0%). The quantitative bibliometric analysis revealed the most SSI topics were COVID-19, antibiotic resistance, and obesity. The main objectives were to develop argumentation skills, regulate emotions, and decision-making. The frequently implemented learning models were problem-based, case-based and practice-based learning. Furthermore, exploratory studies on SSI learning within the health context for improving willingness to act, communication and motivation.Downloads
References
Adal, E. E., & Cakiroglu, J. (2022). Investigation of preservice science teachers’ nature of science understanding and decision making on socioscientific issue through the fractal model. Science & Education, 32(2), 529–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00319-1.
Altan, E. B., Ozturk, N., & Turkoglu, A. Y. (2018). Socio-scientific issues as a context for STEM education: a case study research with pre-service science teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.805.
Annisa, D. N., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2022). Mobile augmented reality in socioscientific issues-based learning: the effectives on students’ conceptual knowledge and socioscientific reasoning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.38993.
Atabey, N. (2021). Science teachers’ argument types and supporting reasons on socioscientific issues: Covid-19 issue. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.2.500.
Aydin, F., Aksut, P., & Demir S. N. (2019). The usability of infographics within the framework of learning outcomes containing socioscientific issues. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.459384.
Bächtold, M., Pallarès, G., De Checchi, K., & Munier, V. (2023). Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 761–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21816.
Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627.
Büssing, A. G., Dupont, J., & Menzel, S. (2020). Topic specificity and antecedents for preservice biology teachers’ anticipated enjoyment for teaching about socioscientific issues: investigating universal values and psychological distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01536.
Bosser, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students’positioning in the classroom: a study of teacher-student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Res Sci Educ, 49, 371-390.
Capkinoglu, E., Leblebicioglu, G., Metin Peten, D., & Cetin, P. S. (2022). The impact of peer review on pre-service science teachers’ written arguments about socioscientific issues related to chemistry. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.17.
Cebesoy, U. B., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2023). Embracing socioscientific issues-based teaching and decision-making in teacher professional development. Educational Review, 75(3), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931037.
Ceyhan, G. D., Lombardi, D., & Saribas, D. (2021). Probing into pre-service science teachers’ practices of scientific evaluation and decision-making on socio-scientific issues. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(8), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1894762.
Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perception, challenges, and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: a systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32(2021), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377.
Choi, Y., & Lee, H. (2021). Exploring the effects of implementing a research-based SSI program on students’ understanding of SSI and willingness to act. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(2), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10033.
Christenson, N., & Walan, S. (2023). Developing pre-service teachers’ competence in assessing socioscientific argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2018103.
Christodoulou, A., Levinson, R., Davies, P., Grace, M., Nicholl, J., & Rietdijk, W. (2021). The use of cartography of controversy within socioscientific issues-based education: students’ mapping of the badger-cattle controversy in England. International Journal of Science Education, 43(15), 2479–2500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1970852.
Cian, H. (2020). The influence of context: comparing high school students’ socioscientific reasoning by socioscientific topic. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1767316.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson. 237-241.
Dalaila, I., Widiyaningrum, P., & Saptono, S. (2022). Developing e-module based on socio-scientific issues to improve students scientific literacy. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 11(3), 285–294. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise.
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2022). Testing a methodology for the development of socioscientific issues to enhance middle school students’ argumentation and reasoning. Research in Science and Technological Education, 40(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1830267.
de Freitas, A. C., do Nascimento, L. A., de Castro, R. G., Motokane, M. T., & Reis, P. (2023). Biodiversity and citizenship in an argumentative socioscientific process. Sustainability, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042987.
Deta, U. A., Arika, Lentika, D. L., Lathifah, S. A. S. A., Suliyanah, Admoko, S., & Suprapto, N. (2021). Research trend of socio scientific issues (SSI) in physics learning through bibliometric analysis in 2011-2020 using scopus database and contribution of Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 682-692. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.862
Dewi, C. A., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Implementation of case-based learning in science education: a systematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 729-749. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2023.041
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A Logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44-48.
Estigarribia, L., Torrico Chalabe, J. K., Cisnero, K., Wajner, M., & García-Romano, L. (2022). Co-design of a teaching–learning sequence to address COVID‑19 as a socio‑scientific issue in an infodemic context. Science and Education, 31(6), 1585–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00362-y
Ewing, M., & Sadler, T. D. (2020). Socio-scientific issues instruction: an interdisciplinary approach to increase relevance and systems thinking. The Science Teacher. 18-21.
Falah, M. M., Hartono, Nugroho, S. E., Ridlo, S. (2024). Socio-scientific issues (SSI) research trends: a systematic literature review of publications 2011 – 2022. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2024.004
Fan, Y. C., Wang, T. H., & Wang, K. H. (2020). Studying the effectiveness of an online argumentation model for improving undergraduate students’ argumentation ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12420
Friedrichsen, P. J., Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., & Zangori, L. (2021). Enacting co-designed socio-scientific issues-based curriculum units: a case of secondary science teacher learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1795576
Genc, T., & Acar, F. E. (2021). Perspectives related to socio-scientific issues according to the scientific attitude points of secondary school students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.2.437
Georgiou, M., Evangelia, M., Halkia, K., & Papassideri, I. (2020). Investigating the impact of the duration of engagement in socioscientifc issues in developing greek students’ argumentation and informal reasoning skills. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 16–23.
Golestaneh, M. & Mousavi, S. M. (2024). Exploring Iranian pre-service teachers' conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 44-60. ttps://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2024.003
Gul, M. D., & Akcay, H. (2020). Structuring a new socioscientific issues (SSI) based instruction model: Impacts on pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs) critical thinking skills and dispositions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.785
Ha, H., Park, W., & Song, J. (2022). Preservice elementary teachers’ socioscientific reasoning during a decision-making activity in the context of COVID-19. Science & Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00359-7
Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Ozer, F. (2022). Exploring pre-service biology teachers’ informal reasoning and decision-making about COVID-19. Science and Education, 31(2), 325–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00272-5
Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Rao, A. (2022). Socioscientific issues thinking and action in the midst of science-in-the-making. Science & Education, 31(5), 1105–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00306-y
Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
Hernández-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Rodríguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The effect of using socio-scientific issues and technology in problem-based learning: a systematic review. Education Sciences, 11, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640
Istyadji, M., & Sauqina. (2023). Conception of scientific literacy in the development of scientific literacy assessment tools: a systematic theoretical review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.016
Johnson, J., Macalalag, A. Z., & Dunphy, J. (2020). Incorporating socioscientific issues into a STEM education course: exploring teacher use of argumentation in SSI and plans for classroom implementation. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00026-3
Jumini, S., Madnasri, Cahyono, E., & Parmin, P. (2022). Article review: integration of science, technology, entrepreneurship in learning science through bibliometric analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1237-1253. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2022.172
Kacar, S., & Balim, A. G. (2021). Investigating the effects of argument-driven inquiry method in science course on secondary school students’ levels of conceptual understanding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 816-845. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2021.105
Kammerer, Y., Gottschling, S., & Bråten, I. (2021). The role of internet-specific justification beliefs in source evaluation and corroboration during web search on an unsettled socio-scientific issue. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 342–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952731
Karaarslan-Semiz, G., Cakir-Yildirim, B., Tuncay-Yuksel, B., Ozturk, N., & Irmak, M. (2023). What can be learned from pre-service teachers' intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19 and relevant factors for future crises? a cross sectional survey research. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(3), 567-586. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2023.032
Karakaş, H. (2022). The effect of socioscientific issues-based discussions on increase of attitudes of primary school teacher candidates towards the life science teaching. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2022.107
Karakaya, E., & İrez, O. S. (2022). The relationship between understanding the nature of scientific knowledge and reasoning and decision making in socioscientific issues. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 37(4), 1329–1358. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2022.452
Kärkkäinen, S., Hartikainen-Ahia, A., Elorinne, A. L., Hokkanen, J., & Hämeen-Anttila, K. (2019). Adolescents’ learning and experiences of solving the need for dietary supplementation through socioscientific issue (SSI) method. Health Education, 119(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-01-2019-0002
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science and Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
Kim, G., Mun, K., & Lee, H. (2020). Exploration of Middle School Students’ Ideas of Fine Dust Issues Using Issue Concept Maps. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6, 564-583.
Li, T., & Guo, M. (2021). Scientific literacy in communicating science and socio-scientific issues: prospects and challenges. Front. Psychol, 12, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758000
Lee, S. W., & Tran, S. (2023). Students need more than content knowledge to counter vaccine hesitancy. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00047-23
Lee, H., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: students’ border crossings into a new culture of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21600
Leung, J. S. C. (2020). A practice-based approach to learning nature of science through socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education,1-27.
Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2023). Prioritizing emotion objects in making sense of student learning of socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60, 357-389. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tea.21801
Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W (2020). Conceptual change in socioscientific issues: learning about obesity. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 3134–3158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1856966
Lin, J. W., Cheng, T. S., Wang, S. J., & Chung, C. T. (2020). The effects of socioscientific issues web searches on grade 6 students’ scientific epistemological beliefs: the role of information positions. International Journal of Science Education, 42(15), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1821258
Lund, E. S., Bråten, I., Brandmo, C., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of textual and individual factors on source-content integration when reading about a socio-scientific issue. Reading and Writing, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9868-z
Lombard, F., Schneider, D. K., Merminod, M., Wiess, L. (2020). Balancing emotion and reason to develop critical thinking about popularized neurosciences. Science & Education, 29, 1139-1176.
Martini, Widodo, W., Qosyim, A., Mahdiannur, M. A., & Jatmiko, B. (2021). Improving undergraduate science education students’ argumentation skills through debates on socioscientific issues. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V10I3.30050
Mildenhall, B., Cowie, B. & Sherriff, B. (2018). A STEM extended learning project to raise awareness of social justice in a year 3 primary classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 1-19. http://doi.org 10.1080/09500693.2018.1560514
Minken, Z., Macalalag, Jr., A., Clarke, A., Marco-Bujosa, L., & Rulli, C. (2021). Development of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during lesson planning of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(2), 113–165. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.50
Muhfahroyin, M., Rachmadiarti, F., Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., & Siagiyanto, B. E. (2023). Improving critical thinking of low ability students through TPS and PBL integration in biology learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 606-618. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2023.034.
Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., Denton, C. A., & Losenno, K. M. (2021). Epistemic emotions and epistemic cognition predict critical thinking about socio-scientific issues. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.669908
Namdar, B., Aydin, B., & Raven, S. (2020). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about hydroelectric power issue: the effect of attitudes towards socio-scientific issues and media literacy. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(4), 551–567. www.ijres.net
Nida, S., Marsuki, M. F., & Eilks, I. (2021). Palm-oil-based biodiesel in Indonesia: a case study on a socioscientific issue that engages students to learn chemistry and its impact on society. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(8), 2536–2548. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00244
Nurtamara, L., Sajidan, S., Suranto, S., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2020). The effect of biotechology module with problem based learning in the socioscientific context to enhance students’ socioscientific decision making skills. International Education Studies, 13(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n1p11
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2019). Teaching practices for enactment of socio-scientific issues instruction: an instrumental case study of an experienced biology teacher. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9799-3
Özturk, N., Altan, B. E., & Turkoglu, A. Y. (2021). Discussing socio-scientific issues on twitter: the quality of pre-service science teachers’ arguments. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 7(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.798167
Peel, A., Zangori, L., Friedrichsen, P., Hayes, E., & Sadler, T. (2019). Students’ model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socio-scientific issues-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1564084
Pinto, B. L. (2022). Distinguishing between case based and problem based learning. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 7(3), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2022.2111286
Prasad, R. R. (2022). Mitigating climate change: a study of the university of the South Pacific and the State University of Malang. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2022.113
Purwati, R., Suranto, Sajidan, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Problem-based learning modules with socio-scientific issues topics to closing the gap in argumentation skills. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(4). 35-45.
Putri, A. H., Samsudin, A., & Suhandi, A. (2022). Exhaustive studies before Covid-19 pandemic attack of students’ conceptual change in science education: a literature review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 808-829. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2022.151.
Quigley, C., Herro, D., Shekell, C., Cian, H., & Jacques, L. (2020). Connection learning in STEAM classrooms: opportunities for engaging youth in science and math classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10034-z
Ram, R. (2020). Engaging young people in science education through socioscientific issues of biosecurity. Kotuitui, 15(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2019.1637908
Rietz, L., Jonsson, A., & Lundstrom, M. (2021). Students’ use of justifications in socioscientific argumentation. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 17(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.5617/NORDINA.8203
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of Informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
Sagmeister, K. J., Schinagl, C. W., Kapelari, S., & Vrabl, P. (2021). Students’ experiences of working with a socio-scientific issues-based curriculum unit using role-playing to negotiate antibiotic resistance. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.577501
Salman, M., & Yilmaz, A. (2021). The relationship between the attitude towards socioscientific issues and views on COVID-19 and vaccine. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.4.667
Sasmito, A.P., & Sekarsari, P. (2022). Enhancing students’ understanding and motivation during Covid-19 pandemic via development of virtual laboratory. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/ 10.36681/tused.2022.117
Seiter, K. M., & Fuselier, L. (2021). Content knowledge and social factors influence student moral reasoning about CRISPR/Cas9 in humans. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(6), 790–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21679
Sibic, O., & Topcu, M. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ views towards socio-scientific issues and socio-scientific issue-based instruction. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 6(4), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.749847
Sparks, R. A., Jimenez, P. C., Kirby, C. K., & Dauer, J. M. (2022). Using critical integrative argumentation to assess socioscientific argumentation across decision-making contexts. Education Sciences, 12, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100644
Srinivasan, M., Wilkers, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S. (2007). Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effect of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Academic Medicina, 82(1), 74-82.
Subiantoro, A. W., Handziko, R. C., & Wibowo, Y. (2021). A narrative inquiry of socio-scientific issues-based e-learning development in biology to promote student health literacy. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi., 14(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.20373
Sulistiani, Kartimi, & Sahrir, D. C. (2022). E-modules with android appy pie based on socio-scientific issues to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Education Technology, 6(2), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v
Torres, N., & Cristancho, J. G. (2018). Analysis of the forms of argumentation of teachers in training in the context of a socio-scientific issue. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10221a
Tyrrell, D. C., & Calinger, M. (2020). Breaking the COVID-19 ice: integrating socioscientific issues into problem-based learning lessons in middle school. Edmedia, 120–125. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733249%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC7963393
UNESCO. (2023). Draft revised 1974 recommendation concerning education for international understanding, cooperation and peace and education relating to human rights and fundamental freedoms. 1-26.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wen, N., & Wei, R. (2018). Examining effects of informational use of social media platforms and social capital on civic engagement regarding genetically modified foods in China. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3729–3750. http://ijoc.org.
Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2021). Promoting students’ scientific habits of mind and chemical literacy using the context of socio-scientific issues on the inquiry learning. frontiers in Education, 6, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.660495
World Health Organization. (2015). Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. 1-28.
Yerdelen, S., Cansiz, M., Cansiz, N., & Akcay, H. (2018). Promoting preservice teachers’ attitudes toward socioscientific issues. Journal of Education in Science, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.387465
Yun, A., Shi, C., & Jun, B. G. (2020). Dealing with socio-scientific issues in science exhibition: a literature review. Research in Science Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09930-0
Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2014). Scientific practices in elementary classrooms: third-grade students’ scientific explanations for seed structure and function. Science Education, 98(4), 614–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21121.
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 21(2). 49-58.
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education. 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Turkish Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements: Credit must be given to the creator; only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted; no derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.
