Two decades of STEM education studies in higher education: A bibliometric analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.023

Keywords:

STEM education, STEAM, higher education, bibliometric analysis

Abstract

STEM education is gaining more attention due to its significant contribution to educational development. The authors employed bibliometric analysis to determine how STEM education research was developing. The study aims to present an up-to-date overview of the STEM education research landscape in the context of higher education from 2002 to 2022. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 1,282 papers were downloaded from the Scopus database for further analysis. Data analysis included publications and citations, the most frequently cited documents, sources, institutions, the most influential countries, the most prolific authors, co-authorship for authors and countries, and co-occurrence of author keywords using VOSviewer software. There has been an increasing trend in the number of publications from 2002 to 2022, peaking in 2020 with 180 articles. The work by Henderson et al. (2011) is the most frequently cited document, with 554 citations to date. In terms of the most productive source, the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition leads the field. The United States and Purdue University emerged as the most productive country and institution, respectively. Carmen C. is identified as the most active author, while Wang X. is the most influential. Frequently occurring keywords include “STEM education”, “STEM” and “Higher education.” The findings highlight the practical need for higher education institutions to prioritise active learning strategies, diversity, and international collaboration to advance STEM education globally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2021). Scientific production and thematic breakthroughs in smart learning environments: A bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00145-4

Aguilera, D. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: a systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331-344. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331

Aldás-Onofre, J., & Cordero, B. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of Web of Science database STEM fields in engineering and mathematics. Ecuador’s case study. In M. Botto-Tobar, M. Zambrano Vizuete, S. Montes León, P. Torres-Carrión, & B. Durakovic (Eds.), Applied technologies (pp. 255–270). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Ali, J., Jusoh, A., Idris, N., Abbas, A. F., & Alsharif, A. H. (2021). Everything is going electronic, so do services and service quality: Bibliometric analysis of e-services and e-service quality. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(18), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i18.24519

Batdi, V., Talan, T., & Semerci, C. (2019). Meta-analytic and meta-thematic analysis of STEM education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(4), 382-399.

Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2018). The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465

Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2021). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919-2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943

Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The prospect of an “A” in STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 10–15.

Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Elsevier. (2020). Scopus content coverage guide. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf

Ertl, B., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2017). The impact of gender stereotypes on the self-concept of female students in STEM subjects with an under-representation of females. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 253122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00703

Gil-Doménech, D., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Merigó, J. M. (2020). STEM education: A bibliometric overview. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 894, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15413-4_15

Ha, C. T., Thao, T. T. P., Trung, N. T., Huong, L. T. T., Dinh, N. V., & Trung, T. (2020). A bibliometric review of research on STEM education in ASEAN: science mapping the literature in Scopus database, 2000 to 2019. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1889. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8500

Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439

Irwanto, I., & Ananda, L. R. (2024). A systematic literature review of STEAM education in the last decade. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2982, 040020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182945

Irwanto, I., & Rini, T. D. S. (2024). Research trends in blended learning in chemistry: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus indexed publications (2012–2022). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(3), 566-578. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.030

Irwanto, I., Saputro, A. D., Widiyanti, Ramadhan, M. F., & Lukman, I. R. (2022). Research trends in STEM education from 2011 to 2020: a systematic review of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(5), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i05.27003

Irwanto, I., Saputro, A. D., Widiyanti, W., & Laksana, S. D. (2023). Global trends on mobile learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis (2002–2022). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(2), 373-383. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.2.1816

Irwanto, I., Wahyudiati, D., Saputro, A. D., & Laksana, S. D. (2023). Research trends and applications of gamification in higher education: A bibliometric analysis spanning 2013–2022. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(5), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i05.37021

Jamali, S.M., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Jamali, F. (2023). The role of STEM Education in improving the quality of education: a bibliometric study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09762-1

Kaffash, S., Nguyen, A. T., & Zhu, J. (2020). Big data algorithms and applications in intelligent transportation system: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107868

Kushairi, N., & Ahmi, A. (2021). Flipped classroom in the second decade of the Millenia: A bibliometrics analysis with Lotka’s law. Education and İnformation Technologies, 26(4), 4401–4431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10457-8

Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., Ladd, B., Pearon, J., & Plague, G. (2012). Rethinking STEM education: an interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316

Manduca, C. A., Iverson, E. R., Luxenberg, M., Macdonald, R. H., McConnell, D. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2017). Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600193

Marín-Marín, J. A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: A bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x

Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522

Matarić, M., Koenig, N., & Feil-Seifer, D. (2007). Materials for enabling hands-on robotics and STEM education. AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration. https://cdn.aaai.org/Symposia/Spring/2007/SS-07-09/SS07-09-022.pdf

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Ortiz-Revilla, J., Adúriz-Bravo, A. & Greca, I. M. (2020). A Framework for Epistemological Discussion on Integrated STEM Education. Science & Education, 29, 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00131-9

Osman, S. Z. Md, & Napeah, R. Md. (2021). A visual pattern of two decades of literature on mobile learning: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(10), 291–312.

Ozkan, G., & Umdu Topsakal, U. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586

Palmer, R., Maramba, D. C., & Dancy, T. E. (2011). A qualitative ınvestigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. Journal of Negro Education, 80(4), 491–504.

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002

Prabowo, N. K., Paristiowati, M., & Irwanto, I. (2024). Arduino-based real-time data acquisition systems: boosting STEM career interest. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2316-2325. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.27001

Prahani, B. K., Rizki, I. A., Suprapto, N., Irwanto, I., & Kurtuluş, M. A. (2024). Mapping research on scientific creativity: A bibliometric review of the literature in the last 20 years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101495

Resurchify. (2022). What ıs the difference between conference papers, journal papers, term papers, seminar papers, proceeding, transactions, seminar, technical report and patents?. https://www.resurchify.com/blog/article/what-is-the-difference-between-conference-papers-8

Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036981

Shadle, S. E., Marker, A., & Earl, B. (2017). Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7

Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2020). CiteScore: advances, evolution, applications, and limitations. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36, 459–468. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09736-y

Thu, H. L. T., Tran, T., Phuong, T. T. T., Tuyet, T. L. T., Huy, H. Le, & Thi, T. V. (2021). Two decades of STEM education research in middle school: A bibliometrics analysis in Scopus database (2000–2020). Education Sciences, 11(7), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070353

Tsai, H. L., & Wu, J. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of flipped classroom publications from the Web of Science core collection published from 2000 to 2019. Science Editing, 7(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.212

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). VOSviewer Manual. University of Leiden. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.13.pdf

Vrettas, G., & Sanderson, M. (2015). Conferences versus journals in computer science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2674-2684. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23349

Wahono, B., Narulita, E., Chang, C.-Y., Darmawan, E., & Irwanto, I. (2021). The role of students’ worldview on decision-making: an Indonesian case study by a socio-scientific ıssue-based ınstruction through ıntegrated STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11), em2027. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11246

Yu, P. (2021). Development, characteristic and enlightenment of steam education in the United States. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4(10), 96-99. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2021.041019

Zhang, F., Wang, H., Bai, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the landscape of problem-based learning research (1981–2021). Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 828390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828390

Downloads

Published

01.10.2025

How to Cite

Irwanto, I., & Hutahaean, E. . (2025). Two decades of STEM education studies in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 22(3), 451-467. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.023